A Novel Method for Objective Weighting in MCDM: The Lorentzian Distance Approach (LDA) Model

The objective determination of criterion weights in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) processes is of critical importance for ensuring the validity and reliability of decision outcomes. However, most existing methods primarily focus on internal variations or linear relationships among criteria, often overlooking external distributional effects and complex interdependencies. To address these methodological limitations, this study introduces an innovative framework the Lorentzian Distance Approach (LDA) which simultaneously considers both internal and external distributions of criteria. LDA statistically models the normalized distributions of criteria and employs the Lorentzian distance metric to measure inter-criterion divergence with high sensitivity. Empirical analyses conducted on the 2024 Global Innovation Index (GII) dataset (Criteria: Institutions, Human Capital and Research, Infrastructure, Market Sophistication, Business Sophistication, Knowledge and Technology Outputs, Creative Outputs; Alternatives: Indonesia, Mauritius, Mexico, Georgia, North Macedonia, Russian Federation, Ukraine) revealed that LDA demonstrates strong consistency and robustness in maintaining alternative rankings. In the rank reversal analysis, LDA exhibited a high degree of structural alignment with the ENTROPY (rho = 0.964, p < 0.01) and SVP (rho = 0.964, p < 0.01) methods. Furthermore, case studies based on the World Competitiveness Booklet and the Global Sustainable Index confirmed that LDA maintains ranking stability and preserves its homogeneous structure throughout simulation analyses. The selected datasets were chosen for their qualitative representation of global and international characteristics and their quantitative suitability, ensuring that no dominant criterion values existed among countries. In conclusion, the LDA method emerges as a methodologically robust, flexible, and adaptable approach, offering a compelling alternative to classical weighting models and demonstrating strong potential for application in decision-making environments under uncertainty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30931/jetas.1763839
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Method for Objective Weighting in MCDM: The Lorentzian Distance Approach (LDA) Model

Furkan Fahri ALTINTAŞ
Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Novel Method for Objective Weighting in MCDM: The Lorentzian Distance Approach (LDA) Model

Furkan Fahri ALTINTAŞ
article en

Abstract

The objective determination of criterion weights in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) processes is of critical importance for ensuring the validity and reliability of decision outcomes. However, most existing methods primarily focus on internal variations or linear relationships among criteria, often overlooking external distributional effects and complex interdependencies. To address these methodological limitations, this study introduces an innovative framework the Lorentzian Distance Approach (LDA) which simultaneously considers both internal and external distributions of criteria. LDA statistically models the normalized distributions of criteria and employs the Lorentzian distance metric to measure inter-criterion divergence with high sensitivity. Empirical analyses conducted on the 2024 Global Innovation Index (GII) dataset (Criteria: Institutions, Human Capital and Research, Infrastructure, Market Sophistication, Business Sophistication, Knowledge and Technology Outputs, Creative Outputs; Alternatives: Indonesia, Mauritius, Mexico, Georgia, North Macedonia, Russian Federation, Ukraine) revealed that LDA demonstrates strong consistency and robustness in maintaining alternative rankings. In the rank reversal analysis, LDA exhibited a high degree of structural alignment with the ENTROPY (rho = 0.964, p < 0.01) and SVP (rho = 0.964, p < 0.01) methods. Furthermore, case studies based on the World Competitiveness Booklet and the Global Sustainable Index confirmed that LDA maintains ranking stability and preserves its homogeneous structure throughout simulation analyses. The selected datasets were chosen for their qualitative representation of global and international characteristics and their quantitative suitability, ensuring that no dominant criterion values existed among countries. In conclusion, the LDA method emerges as a methodologically robust, flexible, and adaptable approach, offering a compelling alternative to classical weighting models and demonstrating strong potential for application in decision-making environments under uncertainty.

Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied SciencesVol. 11
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.