Polaritonic Materials: A Comparative Study on the Relaxation Kinetics in Fabry–Perot versus Plasmonic Cavities

ABSTRACT Strong exciton–photon coupling results in the formation of hybrid light–matter states whose relaxation dynamics often experience a bottleneck due to a large manifold of dark states. This bottleneck results in dynamics like those of the uncoupled material, hampering the observation and utilization of polaritonic properties. A possible solution to this problem is to use cavities with fewer dark states, suggesting a need for an increased understanding of the influence of the cavity platform on the polariton photophysics. Here, we use pump‐probe spectroscopy to compare Fabry–Perot cavities and plasmonic nanorods coupled under identical conditions and analyze how the cavity influences relaxation kinetics. Fabry–Perot cavities host a large number of dark states, leading to dynamics fully dominated by the bottleneck. However, the relaxation from polaritonic states in nanorod systems is distinctly different compared to the uncoupled materials, with a sub‐100 fs decay that dominates the kinetics. This fast relaxation emerges only when selectively exciting within the polaritonic region: off‐resonance excitation yields plasmonic hot‐carrier dynamics. These findings show that the cavity critically defines polariton relaxation. Moreover, this work suggests that plasmonic cavities can operate as either polaritons or plasmons, offering tunable functionality for applications in, for instance, polaritonic chemistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Optical Materials
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202600023
Primary Topic
Strong Light-Matter Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polaritonic Materials: A Comparative Study on the Relaxation Kinetics in Fabry–Perot versus Plasmonic Cavities

Rahul Bhuyan, James Lloyd‐Hughes, Raj Pandya, Karl Börjesson et al.
Advanced Optical Materials
Strong Light-Matter Interactions
article

Polaritonic Materials: A Comparative Study on the Relaxation Kinetics in Fabry–Perot versus Plasmonic Cavities

Rahul Bhuyan, James Lloyd‐Hughes, Raj Pandya, Karl Börjesson, Nicola Peruffo, Jack M. Woolley
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Strong exciton–photon coupling results in the formation of hybrid light–matter states whose relaxation dynamics often experience a bottleneck due to a large manifold of dark states. This bottleneck results in dynamics like those of the uncoupled material, hampering the observation and utilization of polaritonic properties. A possible solution to this problem is to use cavities with fewer dark states, suggesting a need for an increased understanding of the influence of the cavity platform on the polariton photophysics. Here, we use pump‐probe spectroscopy to compare Fabry–Perot cavities and plasmonic nanorods coupled under identical conditions and analyze how the cavity influences relaxation kinetics. Fabry–Perot cavities host a large number of dark states, leading to dynamics fully dominated by the bottleneck. However, the relaxation from polaritonic states in nanorod systems is distinctly different compared to the uncoupled materials, with a sub‐100 fs decay that dominates the kinetics. This fast relaxation emerges only when selectively exciting within the polaritonic region: off‐resonance excitation yields plasmonic hot‐carrier dynamics. These findings show that the cavity critically defines polariton relaxation. Moreover, this work suggests that plasmonic cavities can operate as either polaritons or plasmons, offering tunable functionality for applications in, for instance, polaritonic chemistry.

Advanced Optical Materials
University of Warwick (GB), University of Gothenburg (SE)
University of Warwick, European Commission, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Strong Light-Matter Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.