Implementation and Management of Cancer Clinical Quality Registries in Australia: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: In Australia, clinical quality registries (CQRs) for cancer care are becoming increasingly common, requiring integration across multiple sectors of the health system. This study sought to identify the means to successful implementation of CQRs in Australia by identifying barriers and facilitators of implementation and sustainability, and drivers of acceptability and feasibility. METHODS: Online semi-structured interviews were conducted between May and June 2023 with directors, program leads, data managers, clinical champions, and other staff involved in implementation or management of CQRs across Australia. Barriers to and facilitators of implementing and delivering CQRs were mapped to themes of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) V.2.0. RESULTS: Twenty stakeholders were interviewed. Participants identified a wide range of feasibility and implementation challenges for CQRs, with some questioning the ability of a CQR to facilitate clinical change. Participants strongly advocated for streamlined ethics and governance processes, appropriate technology infrastructure, sustainable funding, and workforce allocation. Stakeholders identified that the ongoing success of a CQR is influenced by lack of funding, low data quality, poor stakeholder motivation, and lack of training. Practical strategies to address challenges included developing a community of practice, clear training and guidelines, instating clinical champions, and appropriate pre-planning. CONCLUSION: Strong guidance to better support organizational oversight, training, management, and CQR operations will further strengthen and support successful future implementation. Practical strategies to address implementation challenges and to provide ongoing support for CQRs included developing a community of practice, clear training and guidelines, instating clinical champions, and appropriate pre-planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.70182
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Implementation and Management of Cancer Clinical Quality Registries in Australia: A Qualitative Study

Jonathan Clark, Rebecca L. Venchiarutti, Ashleigh R. Sharman
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Implementation and Management of Cancer Clinical Quality Registries in Australia: A Qualitative Study

Jonathan Clark, Rebecca L. Venchiarutti, Ashleigh R. Sharman
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Australia, clinical quality registries (CQRs) for cancer care are becoming increasingly common, requiring integration across multiple sectors of the health system. This study sought to identify the means to successful implementation of CQRs in Australia by identifying barriers and facilitators of implementation and sustainability, and drivers of acceptability and feasibility. METHODS: Online semi-structured interviews were conducted between May and June 2023 with directors, program leads, data managers, clinical champions, and other staff involved in implementation or management of CQRs across Australia. Barriers to and facilitators of implementing and delivering CQRs were mapped to themes of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) V.2.0. RESULTS: Twenty stakeholders were interviewed. Participants identified a wide range of feasibility and implementation challenges for CQRs, with some questioning the ability of a CQR to facilitate clinical change. Participants strongly advocated for streamlined ethics and governance processes, appropriate technology infrastructure, sustainable funding, and workforce allocation. Stakeholders identified that the ongoing success of a CQR is influenced by lack of funding, low data quality, poor stakeholder motivation, and lack of training. Practical strategies to address challenges included developing a community of practice, clear training and guidelines, instating clinical champions, and appropriate pre-planning. CONCLUSION: Strong guidance to better support organizational oversight, training, management, and CQR operations will further strengthen and support successful future implementation. Practical strategies to address implementation challenges and to provide ongoing support for CQRs included developing a community of practice, clear training and guidelines, instating clinical champions, and appropriate pre-planning.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Cancer Institute NSW
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.