Viksit Bharat @2047 and the Governance of Bioterrorism: A Critical Analysis of India's Legal, Constitutional and Institutional Framework for Biosecurity

Abstract India's aspiration to become a Viksit Bharat, a developed nation, by the centenary of its independence in 2047 rests on the premise of a secure, resilient and self-reliant State. Among the non-traditional security threats that could derail this trajectory, bioterrorism occupies a uniquely dangerous position because of its capacity for silent, borderless and exponential harm. This paper undertakes a critical examination of India's existing legal, constitutional and institutional architecture for biosecurity governance and asks whether it is adequate to the demands of the Viksit Bharat vision. It begins by situating bioterrorism and biosecurity within a conceptual framework that distinguishes deliberate biological attacks from natural epidemics and accidental laboratory releases. It then traces the constitutional foundations of public health and security governance under Articles 21, 47, 246 and 253 and the relevant entries of the Seventh Schedule, before undertaking a systematic audit of the statutory landscape, including the colonial-era Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Biological Diversity Act, 2003, and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Act, 2005. The paper maps the institutional architecture spanning the National Disaster Management Authority, the Department of Biotechnology, the National Centre for Disease Control and allied defence agencies, and evaluates India's compliance with the Biological Weapons Convention and allied international regimes. Drawing on comparative material from China, Australia, the United Kingdom and the European Union, the paper identifies structural gaps, including fragmented jurisdiction, the absence of a dedicated biosecurity statute, weak dual-use research oversight and inadequate civil-military-scientific coordination. It concludes by proposing a reform roadmap, anchored in a unified Biosecurity Act, a National Biosecurity Authority and a One Health approach, as a precondition for realising the security dimension of Viksit Bharat @2047.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22724735
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Viksit Bharat @2047 and the Governance of Bioterrorism: A Critical Analysis of India's Legal, Constitutional and Institutional Framework for Biosecurity

Mansing Dhondiram Bisure, Tanaya Kamalakar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global Security and Public Health
article

Viksit Bharat @2047 and the Governance of Bioterrorism: A Critical Analysis of India's Legal, Constitutional and Institutional Framework for Biosecurity

Mansing Dhondiram Bisure, Tanaya Kamalakar
article en

Abstract

Abstract India's aspiration to become a Viksit Bharat, a developed nation, by the centenary of its independence in 2047 rests on the premise of a secure, resilient and self-reliant State. Among the non-traditional security threats that could derail this trajectory, bioterrorism occupies a uniquely dangerous position because of its capacity for silent, borderless and exponential harm. This paper undertakes a critical examination of India's existing legal, constitutional and institutional architecture for biosecurity governance and asks whether it is adequate to the demands of the Viksit Bharat vision. It begins by situating bioterrorism and biosecurity within a conceptual framework that distinguishes deliberate biological attacks from natural epidemics and accidental laboratory releases. It then traces the constitutional foundations of public health and security governance under Articles 21, 47, 246 and 253 and the relevant entries of the Seventh Schedule, before undertaking a systematic audit of the statutory landscape, including the colonial-era Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Biological Diversity Act, 2003, and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Act, 2005. The paper maps the institutional architecture spanning the National Disaster Management Authority, the Department of Biotechnology, the National Centre for Disease Control and allied defence agencies, and evaluates India's compliance with the Biological Weapons Convention and allied international regimes. Drawing on comparative material from China, Australia, the United Kingdom and the European Union, the paper identifies structural gaps, including fragmented jurisdiction, the absence of a dedicated biosecurity statute, weak dual-use research oversight and inadequate civil-military-scientific coordination. It concludes by proposing a reform roadmap, anchored in a unified Biosecurity Act, a National Biosecurity Authority and a One Health approach, as a precondition for realising the security dimension of Viksit Bharat @2047.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Maharashtra National Law University Mumbai (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.