Serving Epistemic Justice Through Critical Writing Pedagogies in Science and Technology Studies (STS)

Writing in Science and Technology Studies (STS) reproduces STS knowledge, yet ways of writing remain invisible and normative within a discipline committed to epistemological openness. Ways of knowing and languaging are inextricably linked: written knowledge plays a central role in scholars’ entry and advancement. We argue that recalibrating norms in teaching STS writing could decentralize dominant, colonial ways of thinking in the field. Although STS scholars are from many geographic and cultural backgrounds and possess diverse “languaging” repertoires, scholarship in White Mainstream English (WME) remains most valued. Constructed linguistic hierarchies disadvantage “non-native” speakers, especially English-language learners (ELLs), thereby marginalizing other ways of knowing. Concurrently, students are also STS-language learners (STSLLs), requiring assimilation to succeed in the field. We propose a critical approach to teaching that prioritizes diverse ways of knowing to liberate the writing and publication process from exclusionary tendencies experienced intersectionally by ELLs and STSLLs. We argue that developing writing skills in STS should involve reflection on presumptions and norms around language, and purposive instruction in STS language learning. Our approach empowers STSLLs and ELLs in this language acquisition, integrating writers of various backgrounds and resisting tendencies to rank and devalue languaging that diverges from WME.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Technology & Human Values
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439261481578
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serving Epistemic Justice Through Critical Writing Pedagogies in Science and Technology Studies (STS)

Marlise Horvath Schneider, Kylie Quave, Amanda Almeida Domingues
Science Technology & Human Values
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Serving Epistemic Justice Through Critical Writing Pedagogies in Science and Technology Studies (STS)

Marlise Horvath Schneider, Kylie Quave, Amanda Almeida Domingues
article en

Abstract

Writing in Science and Technology Studies (STS) reproduces STS knowledge, yet ways of writing remain invisible and normative within a discipline committed to epistemological openness. Ways of knowing and languaging are inextricably linked: written knowledge plays a central role in scholars’ entry and advancement. We argue that recalibrating norms in teaching STS writing could decentralize dominant, colonial ways of thinking in the field. Although STS scholars are from many geographic and cultural backgrounds and possess diverse “languaging” repertoires, scholarship in White Mainstream English (WME) remains most valued. Constructed linguistic hierarchies disadvantage “non-native” speakers, especially English-language learners (ELLs), thereby marginalizing other ways of knowing. Concurrently, students are also STS-language learners (STSLLs), requiring assimilation to succeed in the field. We propose a critical approach to teaching that prioritizes diverse ways of knowing to liberate the writing and publication process from exclusionary tendencies experienced intersectionally by ELLs and STSLLs. We argue that developing writing skills in STS should involve reflection on presumptions and norms around language, and purposive instruction in STS language learning. Our approach empowers STSLLs and ELLs in this language acquisition, integrating writers of various backgrounds and resisting tendencies to rank and devalue languaging that diverges from WME.

Science Technology & Human Values
George Washington University (US), Technical University of Munich (DE), Michigan State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.