A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study With Cost and Predictive Analysis of Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing at a Tertiary Care Oncology Hospital

Background: PPIs are among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide. In cancer treatment settings, they are often used preventively and to manage gut complications. Nonetheless, the issue of inappropriate prescribing continues to persist. Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study were to assess the appropriateness of the prescribing of PPIs in cancer patients as recommended by AGA and determine the predictors and financial burden of irrational use and adherence to deprescribing. Methods: A research study was conducted at cancer hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan as a retrospective cross-sectional study. A total of 200 adult patients suffering from cancer were subjected to evaluation between February and August 2023 who were taking PPIs. According to the AGA Best Practice Advice, prescriptions were assessed for indication, dose, frequency, and duration. The analysis also included deprescribing practices. The study employed chi-square and multi-variate logistic regression. Results: Over a quarter (27%) of the prescriptions were justified for indications supported by guidelines and overall rational prescribing was seen in only 1 in 8 (12.5%) cases. Documentation of indications was available in 50.5% and was the strongest predictor of rational use (OR 6.23; 95% CI 2.06-18.91; P = .001). Proper prescription practices were also associated with increasing age (OR 1.048, P = .01) and inpatient status (OR 3.87, P = .009). Irrational prescriptions were associated with significantly greater capsule counts and cost (PKR 564.00 vs PKR 292.60, P = .001). Minimal adherence was seen with no case meeting the key criteria of discontinuation therapy or dose reduction. Conclusion: Oncology patients frequently receive inappropriate PPI prescribing, that is, not aligned with guideline-recommended deprescribing practices. To ensure more rational medication use, enhanced indication documentation, regular medication reviews, and structured deprescribing strategies are essential to reduce costs and minimize risk for patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hospital Pharmacy
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787261482133
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study With Cost and Predictive Analysis of Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing at a Tertiary Care Oncology Hospital

Omar Akhlaq Bhutta, Muhammad Ashfaq, Muhammad Junaid Hassan Sharif, Sajjad Ullah et al.
Hospital Pharmacy
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study With Cost and Predictive Analysis of Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing at a Tertiary Care Oncology Hospital

Omar Akhlaq Bhutta, Muhammad Ashfaq, Muhammad Junaid Hassan Sharif, Sajjad Ullah, Qasim Khan, Ramsha Abid, Ghulam Mujtaba
article en

Abstract

Background: PPIs are among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide. In cancer treatment settings, they are often used preventively and to manage gut complications. Nonetheless, the issue of inappropriate prescribing continues to persist. Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study were to assess the appropriateness of the prescribing of PPIs in cancer patients as recommended by AGA and determine the predictors and financial burden of irrational use and adherence to deprescribing. Methods: A research study was conducted at cancer hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan as a retrospective cross-sectional study. A total of 200 adult patients suffering from cancer were subjected to evaluation between February and August 2023 who were taking PPIs. According to the AGA Best Practice Advice, prescriptions were assessed for indication, dose, frequency, and duration. The analysis also included deprescribing practices. The study employed chi-square and multi-variate logistic regression. Results: Over a quarter (27%) of the prescriptions were justified for indications supported by guidelines and overall rational prescribing was seen in only 1 in 8 (12.5%) cases. Documentation of indications was available in 50.5% and was the strongest predictor of rational use (OR 6.23; 95% CI 2.06-18.91; P = .001). Proper prescription practices were also associated with increasing age (OR 1.048, P = .01) and inpatient status (OR 3.87, P = .009). Irrational prescriptions were associated with significantly greater capsule counts and cost (PKR 564.00 vs PKR 292.60, P = .001). Minimal adherence was seen with no case meeting the key criteria of discontinuation therapy or dose reduction. Conclusion: Oncology patients frequently receive inappropriate PPI prescribing, that is, not aligned with guideline-recommended deprescribing practices. To ensure more rational medication use, enhanced indication documentation, regular medication reviews, and structured deprescribing strategies are essential to reduce costs and minimize risk for patients.

Hospital Pharmacy
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), Punjab Institute of Cardiology (PK), Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.