Continuous GRC for Agentic AI

This article examines Continuous Governance, Risk, and Compliance (Continuous GRC) as a foundational requirement for autonomous and agentic AI systems. It argues that periodic assessments and retrospective audits are insufficient for systems that continuously interpret goals, delegate authority, invoke tools, access resources, and modify operational state. The article develops a runtime governance model that connects machine-executable policies, continuous risk evaluation, control validation, Evidence-as-Code, provenance, drift detection, bounded exceptions, human oversight, and governed risk response. It explains how governance decisions must adapt to changes in identity, authority, context, system behavior, environmental conditions, and evidence quality while preserving accountability and auditability. The analysis expresses these requirements as technology-independent architectural invariants within SGAEIA — Secure Governed Autonomous Edge Intelligence Architecture. It demonstrates how continuous assurance can connect policy intent, runtime decisions, autonomous actions, control effectiveness, and verifiable evidence across distributed multi-agent and edge environments. This deposit preserves the author-manuscript archival edition of the article originally published on Medium on 12 September 2026. Original publication:https://medium.com/@aridiosilva/continuous-grc-for-agentic-ai-ada11c2974d0 Archival edition DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22728227

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22728227
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuous GRC for Agentic AI

Aridio Silva
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Continuous GRC for Agentic AI

Aridio Silva
article en

Abstract

This article examines Continuous Governance, Risk, and Compliance (Continuous GRC) as a foundational requirement for autonomous and agentic AI systems. It argues that periodic assessments and retrospective audits are insufficient for systems that continuously interpret goals, delegate authority, invoke tools, access resources, and modify operational state. The article develops a runtime governance model that connects machine-executable policies, continuous risk evaluation, control validation, Evidence-as-Code, provenance, drift detection, bounded exceptions, human oversight, and governed risk response. It explains how governance decisions must adapt to changes in identity, authority, context, system behavior, environmental conditions, and evidence quality while preserving accountability and auditability. The analysis expresses these requirements as technology-independent architectural invariants within SGAEIA — Secure Governed Autonomous Edge Intelligence Architecture. It demonstrates how continuous assurance can connect policy intent, runtime decisions, autonomous actions, control effectiveness, and verifiable evidence across distributed multi-agent and edge environments. This deposit preserves the author-manuscript archival edition of the article originally published on Medium on 12 September 2026. Original publication:https://medium.com/@aridiosilva/continuous-grc-for-agentic-ai-ada11c2974d0 Archival edition DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22728227

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.