KES-F-based assessment of tensile and compression properties in sewn seams of plain weave cotton woven fabric

Purpose In this study, the Kawabata Evaluation System for Fabrics (KES-F) is used to assess and analyse the detailed tensile and compressive properties of sewn seams on 100% plain woven fabrics. Design/methodology/approach Three levels of process factors, which include fabric areal densities (50, 70 and 90 GSM), stitch densities (stitches per inch) (10, 12, 14) and Sewing Thread Ticket Numbers (30, 80 and 130), were selected for sample development with superimposed seam (SSa) using a single-needle lockstitch machine under 301 stitch class. Optimisation of the influencing sewing parameters on KES-based tensile and compression characteristics along the seam line was performed using response surface methodology (RSM) based on a Box–Behnken Design. Findings To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first to systematically model both tensile and compression KES responses directly along the sewn seam using RSM. The results of this study demonstrated that one of the sewing parameters, such as fabric areal density (GSM), is the dominant factor influencing the tensile response at the seam line. In contrast, stitch density and sewing thread ticket number have significantly affected extensibility and load transfer behaviour. Originality/value The developed regression models for the low-stress mechanical tensile and compression responses on the seam line exhibit higher statistical suitability and predictive capability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Journal of Textile and Apparel
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-02-2026-0030
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KES-F-based assessment of tensile and compression properties in sewn seams of plain weave cotton woven fabric

T. Senthilkumar, B. Senthil Kumar, Raja ASM, Lakshmanakanth P et al.
Research Journal of Textile and Apparel
Textile materials and evaluations
article

KES-F-based assessment of tensile and compression properties in sewn seams of plain weave cotton woven fabric

T. Senthilkumar, B. Senthil Kumar, Raja ASM, Lakshmanakanth P, Nishant Digamber Kambli, Selvakumar A
article en

Abstract

Purpose In this study, the Kawabata Evaluation System for Fabrics (KES-F) is used to assess and analyse the detailed tensile and compressive properties of sewn seams on 100% plain woven fabrics. Design/methodology/approach Three levels of process factors, which include fabric areal densities (50, 70 and 90 GSM), stitch densities (stitches per inch) (10, 12, 14) and Sewing Thread Ticket Numbers (30, 80 and 130), were selected for sample development with superimposed seam (SSa) using a single-needle lockstitch machine under 301 stitch class. Optimisation of the influencing sewing parameters on KES-based tensile and compression characteristics along the seam line was performed using response surface methodology (RSM) based on a Box–Behnken Design. Findings To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first to systematically model both tensile and compression KES responses directly along the sewn seam using RSM. The results of this study demonstrated that one of the sewing parameters, such as fabric areal density (GSM), is the dominant factor influencing the tensile response at the seam line. In contrast, stitch density and sewing thread ticket number have significantly affected extensibility and load transfer behaviour. Originality/value The developed regression models for the low-stress mechanical tensile and compression responses on the seam line exhibit higher statistical suitability and predictive capability.

Research Journal of Textile and Apparel
ICAR - Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology (IN), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN), Gandhigram Rural Institute (IN), Fashion Institute of Technology (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Textile materials and evaluations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.