Navigating rural challenges and promoting posttraumatic growth via expressive writing: a qualitative study among rural breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among women in the USA. Rural breast cancer survivors (RBCS) face unique challenges because geographical isolation limits access to facilities, support groups, and mental health services. Expressive writing (EW), a therapeutic intervention navigates individuals through traumatic experiences, has demonstrated benefits for RBCS. However, first-person accounts of how RBCS experience EW remain limited. This study addresses this gap. METHODS: Virtual semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with participants (N = 14) who previously completed a virtual EW randomized controlled trial. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were developed inductively and subsequently interpreted in relation to post-traumatic growth framework as relevant. RESULTS: Interviewees' mean age was 54.71 years. Six themes emerged: rural-specific challenges (e.g., travel burden, infrastructure limit, gossip in small towns); emotion regulation and adaptive coping; personal strength through meaning-making; improved relationships; renewed purpose; and appreciation for life. These themes reflect participants' narratives of how EW fit into their cancer journeys. CONCLUSIONS: Participants reported varied but positive experiences with EW. The intervention appeared to address key psychosocial needs of RBCS, helping to mitigate rural-specific disparities in supportive care and fostering elements of posttraumatic growth. Centering survivors' own narratives adds a nuanced understanding of what it feels like to engage in EW and how the process supports adaptation in survivorship. EW may serve as an economical, accessible, and scalable survivorship support strategy among RBCS. Future studies may triangulate the writings, self-accounts of experiences and intervention outcomes from EW interventions to contextualize the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT04776941 (Registration post date: March 3, 2021).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11204-w
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Navigating rural challenges and promoting posttraumatic growth via expressive writing: a qualitative study among rural breast cancer survivors

Fei Fei, Lenna Dawkins-Moultin, Qian Lü, Yusi Xu et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Mental Health via Writing
article

Navigating rural challenges and promoting posttraumatic growth via expressive writing: a qualitative study among rural breast cancer survivors

Fei Fei, Lenna Dawkins-Moultin, Qian Lü, Yusi Xu, Sarah Mann, Di Lun, Eunju Choi, Celia Ching Yee Wong-Meli, Maria Borjas, Wenyue Jin
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among women in the USA. Rural breast cancer survivors (RBCS) face unique challenges because geographical isolation limits access to facilities, support groups, and mental health services. Expressive writing (EW), a therapeutic intervention navigates individuals through traumatic experiences, has demonstrated benefits for RBCS. However, first-person accounts of how RBCS experience EW remain limited. This study addresses this gap. METHODS: Virtual semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with participants (N = 14) who previously completed a virtual EW randomized controlled trial. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were developed inductively and subsequently interpreted in relation to post-traumatic growth framework as relevant. RESULTS: Interviewees' mean age was 54.71 years. Six themes emerged: rural-specific challenges (e.g., travel burden, infrastructure limit, gossip in small towns); emotion regulation and adaptive coping; personal strength through meaning-making; improved relationships; renewed purpose; and appreciation for life. These themes reflect participants' narratives of how EW fit into their cancer journeys. CONCLUSIONS: Participants reported varied but positive experiences with EW. The intervention appeared to address key psychosocial needs of RBCS, helping to mitigate rural-specific disparities in supportive care and fostering elements of posttraumatic growth. Centering survivors' own narratives adds a nuanced understanding of what it feels like to engage in EW and how the process supports adaptation in survivorship. EW may serve as an economical, accessible, and scalable survivorship support strategy among RBCS. Future studies may triangulate the writings, self-accounts of experiences and intervention outcomes from EW interventions to contextualize the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT04776941 (Registration post date: March 3, 2021).

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(10)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.