Patient preferences for the use of AI in chest X-ray result processing and communication

INTRODUCTION: Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used in imaging such as X-rays, but there is limited evidence about how patients view the use of AI in the diagnostic process. METHODS: Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to select attributes and the Health Belief Model (HBM) to interpret between-group differences this study evaluates patients' preferences regarding the use of AI in processing and communication of chest X-ray (CXR) results in the context of the NHS in the UK. A choice-based conjoint experimental (CBC) design was employed to examine various attributes influencing patient preferences across three samples 1) respondents with lung cancer diagnosis, 2) respondents who have had chest X-rays for any reason and 3) respondents with no recent CXRs. Furthermore, word-emotion association analysis was used to assess and compare the emotions levels in the open-text responses across the samples. RESULTS: A total of 440 respondents completed the study. Overall, respondents expressed support for using AI in X-ray processing, believing it would reduce waiting times. Waiting time and the decision on the next step of the care pathway accounted for the largest share of preference with a combined relative importance; the share of choice variation attributable to these attributes, of ∼67% in Samples 1 and 2 and 60% in Sample 3. Lung cancer patients (Sample 1) significantly favoured combined Human and AI processing (mean part-worth +13.3, p < 0.001), whereas Samples 2 and 3 favoured Human-only to Human and AI (mean part-worth -5.7, p = 0.008 and -12.0, p < 0.001 respectively for the attribute level Human and AI). CONCLUSION: Overall, patients welcome the supplementary use of AI in their care, with lung cancer patients having higher acceptance. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Understanding patient preferences can inform healthcare providers about optimising the diagnostic pathway, improving patient experiences, and potentially alleviating patient anxiety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiography
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2026.103554
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Patient preferences for the use of AI in chest X-ray result processing and communication

N. Woznitza, Janette Rawlinson, Aneesh Banerjee, David Baldwin
Radiography
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Patient preferences for the use of AI in chest X-ray result processing and communication

N. Woznitza, Janette Rawlinson, Aneesh Banerjee, David Baldwin
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used in imaging such as X-rays, but there is limited evidence about how patients view the use of AI in the diagnostic process. METHODS: Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to select attributes and the Health Belief Model (HBM) to interpret between-group differences this study evaluates patients' preferences regarding the use of AI in processing and communication of chest X-ray (CXR) results in the context of the NHS in the UK. A choice-based conjoint experimental (CBC) design was employed to examine various attributes influencing patient preferences across three samples 1) respondents with lung cancer diagnosis, 2) respondents who have had chest X-rays for any reason and 3) respondents with no recent CXRs. Furthermore, word-emotion association analysis was used to assess and compare the emotions levels in the open-text responses across the samples. RESULTS: A total of 440 respondents completed the study. Overall, respondents expressed support for using AI in X-ray processing, believing it would reduce waiting times. Waiting time and the decision on the next step of the care pathway accounted for the largest share of preference with a combined relative importance; the share of choice variation attributable to these attributes, of ∼67% in Samples 1 and 2 and 60% in Sample 3. Lung cancer patients (Sample 1) significantly favoured combined Human and AI processing (mean part-worth +13.3, p < 0.001), whereas Samples 2 and 3 favoured Human-only to Human and AI (mean part-worth -5.7, p = 0.008 and -12.0, p < 0.001 respectively for the attribute level Human and AI). CONCLUSION: Overall, patients welcome the supplementary use of AI in their care, with lung cancer patients having higher acceptance. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Understanding patient preferences can inform healthcare providers about optimising the diagnostic pathway, improving patient experiences, and potentially alleviating patient anxiety.

RadiographyVol. 32(7)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB), The Patients Association (GB), University College London (GB), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, University College London, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.