Why Women Don't Return: Nurse Perspectives on Follow‐Up Care After Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Mississippi's Public Health System

OBJECTIVE: To explore public health nurses' perspectives on reasons women in Mississippi may fail to receive follow-up care after abnormal cervical cancer (CC) screenings. BACKGROUND: Mississippi's high cervical cancer mortality rate poses a significant public health challenge. Understanding public health nurses' perspectives on barriers to follow-up may help improve timely diagnostic care. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study used focus groups to examine barriers and facilitators to follow-up care. Sixteen registered nurses who manage follow-up care in Mississippi public health clinics participated in five virtual focus groups. Participants represented diverse ages and experience levels (mean age 45.5 years; mean 10 years' experience). Semi-structured interviews elicited perspectives on patient, nursing, and system-level barriers and facilitators. Data was thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Three overarching barriers emerged: patient-level (limited health literacy, financial constraints, unreliable contact information), nursing-level (language differences, staffing shortages, declining motivation), and system-level (underuse of electronic health records, limited access to specialty care). Facilitators included early patient education, proactive communication, language resources, adequate staffing and training, and full utilization of electronic health record tools. CONCLUSION: Nurses identified multilevel barriers and facilitators influencing CC follow-up in Mississippi. These insights can inform strategies to improve follow-up care and reduce CC disparities in rural and underserved populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Nursing
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.70186
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Women Don't Return: Nurse Perspectives on Follow‐Up Care After Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Mississippi's Public Health System

Jon Daniels, Megan A. Clarke, Katie C. Hall, Sydney Reaves et al.
Public Health Nursing
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Why Women Don't Return: Nurse Perspectives on Follow‐Up Care After Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Mississippi's Public Health System

Jon Daniels, Megan A. Clarke, Katie C. Hall, Sydney Reaves, Jimmie Wells, Amy L. Parker, Carolann Risley, Mary W. Stewart, Nicolas Wentzensen, Rhonda Rives, Katherine Farrington, Christina D Ferrell
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore public health nurses' perspectives on reasons women in Mississippi may fail to receive follow-up care after abnormal cervical cancer (CC) screenings. BACKGROUND: Mississippi's high cervical cancer mortality rate poses a significant public health challenge. Understanding public health nurses' perspectives on barriers to follow-up may help improve timely diagnostic care. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study used focus groups to examine barriers and facilitators to follow-up care. Sixteen registered nurses who manage follow-up care in Mississippi public health clinics participated in five virtual focus groups. Participants represented diverse ages and experience levels (mean age 45.5 years; mean 10 years' experience). Semi-structured interviews elicited perspectives on patient, nursing, and system-level barriers and facilitators. Data was thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Three overarching barriers emerged: patient-level (limited health literacy, financial constraints, unreliable contact information), nursing-level (language differences, staffing shortages, declining motivation), and system-level (underuse of electronic health records, limited access to specialty care). Facilitators included early patient education, proactive communication, language resources, adequate staffing and training, and full utilization of electronic health record tools. CONCLUSION: Nurses identified multilevel barriers and facilitators influencing CC follow-up in Mississippi. These insights can inform strategies to improve follow-up care and reduce CC disparities in rural and underserved populations.

Public Health Nursing
Meridian Community College (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), Mississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center (US), Mississippi State Department of Health (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Naval Hospital Jacksonville (US), Cancer Genetics (United States) (US), Mississippi State University (US)
National Cancer Institute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.