Influence of Clinically Relevant Seating Loads on Shear-Thinning Behavior and Film Thickness of Light-Cure Veneer Cements

Abstract This article aims to evaluate the shear rate-dependent rheological behavior of light-cure resin cements used for lithium disilicate veneers and assess its relationship with cement film thickness under standardized and clinically relevant seating loads. Five light-cure resin cements (RXV, CVE, ACV, NXL, and VLE) were tested using rotational rheometry under a standardized baseline gap. Apparent viscosity (η) was determined at 10 s−1 and 100 s−1. Cement film thickness was measured following ISO 4049 under 150 N and under reduced loads of 50 and 30 N. All measurements were performed in triplicate (n = 3 per cement for rheology; n = 3 per cement per seating load for film thickness). Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey post hoc tests where appropriate. Linear regression and Pearson's correlation analyses were used to examine load-film thickness trends and viscosity-film thickness associations. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Viscosity differed significantly among materials at both shear rates (p < 0.001). At 10 s−1, viscosity ranged from 210 ± 2 Pa·s (VLE) to 1820 ± 20 Pa·s (NXL), while at 100 s−1 it ranged from 164 ± 2 Pa·s (RXV) to 440 ± 2 Pa·s (VLE). Four cements showed pronounced shear-thinning behavior (−82.6% to −86.3%), whereas VLE showed an inverse response (-109.5%). Film thickness differed significantly across all seating loads (150 N: p = 0.004; 50 and 30 N: p < 0.001). At 30 N, values ranged from 48.3 ± 3.5 µm (RXV) to 74.7 ± 2.5 µm (NXL). Weak positive associations were observed between viscosity and film thickness under reduced seating conditions (r = 0.25 at 30 N; r = 0.24 at 50 N). Seating load was the main determinant of cement film thickness, while shear rate-dependent viscosity showed a secondary, material-dependent contribution under reduced pressure. Favorable shear-thinning behavior may support improved seating adaptation and more consistent film thickness control during veneer placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Dentistry
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1827464
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Influence of Clinically Relevant Seating Loads on Shear-Thinning Behavior and Film Thickness of Light-Cure Veneer Cements

Randa Sabry Ibrahim
European Journal of Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Influence of Clinically Relevant Seating Loads on Shear-Thinning Behavior and Film Thickness of Light-Cure Veneer Cements

Randa Sabry Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to evaluate the shear rate-dependent rheological behavior of light-cure resin cements used for lithium disilicate veneers and assess its relationship with cement film thickness under standardized and clinically relevant seating loads. Five light-cure resin cements (RXV, CVE, ACV, NXL, and VLE) were tested using rotational rheometry under a standardized baseline gap. Apparent viscosity (η) was determined at 10 s−1 and 100 s−1. Cement film thickness was measured following ISO 4049 under 150 N and under reduced loads of 50 and 30 N. All measurements were performed in triplicate (n = 3 per cement for rheology; n = 3 per cement per seating load for film thickness). Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey post hoc tests where appropriate. Linear regression and Pearson's correlation analyses were used to examine load-film thickness trends and viscosity-film thickness associations. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Viscosity differed significantly among materials at both shear rates (p < 0.001). At 10 s−1, viscosity ranged from 210 ± 2 Pa·s (VLE) to 1820 ± 20 Pa·s (NXL), while at 100 s−1 it ranged from 164 ± 2 Pa·s (RXV) to 440 ± 2 Pa·s (VLE). Four cements showed pronounced shear-thinning behavior (−82.6% to −86.3%), whereas VLE showed an inverse response (-109.5%). Film thickness differed significantly across all seating loads (150 N: p = 0.004; 50 and 30 N: p < 0.001). At 30 N, values ranged from 48.3 ± 3.5 µm (RXV) to 74.7 ± 2.5 µm (NXL). Weak positive associations were observed between viscosity and film thickness under reduced seating conditions (r = 0.25 at 30 N; r = 0.24 at 50 N). Seating load was the main determinant of cement film thickness, while shear rate-dependent viscosity showed a secondary, material-dependent contribution under reduced pressure. Favorable shear-thinning behavior may support improved seating adaptation and more consistent film thickness control during veneer placement.

European Journal of Dentistry
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), Tanta University (EG), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.