Wildfire exposure and political participation in Africa

Abstract Civic engagement can shape collective responses to climate change. However, evidence on how climate-related disasters affect political participation in Africa remains limited. Combining Global Fire Atlas records with Afrobarometer surveys of more than 100,000 people in 34 African countries, we show that people living close to wildfires are more likely to vote, contact local councillors, attend community meetings, and raise collective issues, whereas protest participation shows weaker responses. These effects are larger in arid regions and among people with higher climate literacy or access to information, members of politically dominant ethnic groups and those living near ethnic boundaries. Our findings suggest that participation is motivated mainly by immediate material loss and demand for public services, rather than environmental concern. These findings highlight the importance of addressing post-disaster needs to sustain political engagement and public support for long-term climate adaptation in the Global South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77404-4
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Wildfire exposure and political participation in Africa

Michael Appiah‐Kubi, Pengfei Liu, Lina Meng, Siyuan Chen et al.
Nature Communications
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Wildfire exposure and political participation in Africa

Michael Appiah‐Kubi, Pengfei Liu, Lina Meng, Siyuan Chen, Lu Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Civic engagement can shape collective responses to climate change. However, evidence on how climate-related disasters affect political participation in Africa remains limited. Combining Global Fire Atlas records with Afrobarometer surveys of more than 100,000 people in 34 African countries, we show that people living close to wildfires are more likely to vote, contact local councillors, attend community meetings, and raise collective issues, whereas protest participation shows weaker responses. These effects are larger in arid regions and among people with higher climate literacy or access to information, members of politically dominant ethnic groups and those living near ethnic boundaries. Our findings suggest that participation is motivated mainly by immediate material loss and demand for public services, rather than environmental concern. These findings highlight the importance of addressing post-disaster needs to sustain political engagement and public support for long-term climate adaptation in the Global South.

Nature Communications
Xiamen University (CN), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), African Center for Economic Transformation (GH), Beihang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wildfire exposure and political participation in Africa — Michael Appiah‐Kubi, Pengfei Liu, et al. · Nature Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS