Accounting and local democracy in England: the contested purposes of local authority accounts

Purpose In this paper, we critically discuss a new framework for the purposes of local authority accounts and its relationship to the core concepts of accountability, transparency and local democracy. Design/methodology/approach This is accomplished via a critical review of the first UK Parliamentary inquiry of local audit and accounting arrangements. Findings With reference to this inquiry, we largely agree with the Committee that accounts are important as a credible record, as providing accountability for spending, for value for money, to provide information necessary to run local authorities, and for public reporting of potential issues. However, we suggest that the framework must be interpreted critically, ensuring public accountability is meaningfully enhanced, rather than detached rhetorically from practical action. We also suggest the proposed purposes need to be understood with reference to what it is local authorities are being held accountable for, to whom authorities are accountable and who it is within the authorities rendering the account. Taken together, we suggest the new framework can contribute to much-needed public accountability but note the need for more explicit emphasis on local democracy and public engagement. Originality/value The paper provides a framework for how audit and accounting arrangements can be mobilised to improve public accountability across Local Government contexts and a reflection on the importance of critical interpretation of policy recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-11-2025-0322
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Accounting and local democracy in England: the contested purposes of local authority accounts

James Brackley, Laurence Ferry, Thomas Ahrens, Henry Midgley
Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Accounting and local democracy in England: the contested purposes of local authority accounts

James Brackley, Laurence Ferry, Thomas Ahrens, Henry Midgley
article en

Abstract

Purpose In this paper, we critically discuss a new framework for the purposes of local authority accounts and its relationship to the core concepts of accountability, transparency and local democracy. Design/methodology/approach This is accomplished via a critical review of the first UK Parliamentary inquiry of local audit and accounting arrangements. Findings With reference to this inquiry, we largely agree with the Committee that accounts are important as a credible record, as providing accountability for spending, for value for money, to provide information necessary to run local authorities, and for public reporting of potential issues. However, we suggest that the framework must be interpreted critically, ensuring public accountability is meaningfully enhanced, rather than detached rhetorically from practical action. We also suggest the proposed purposes need to be understood with reference to what it is local authorities are being held accountable for, to whom authorities are accountable and who it is within the authorities rendering the account. Taken together, we suggest the new framework can contribute to much-needed public accountability but note the need for more explicit emphasis on local democracy and public engagement. Originality/value The paper provides a framework for how audit and accounting arrangements can be mobilised to improve public accountability across Local Government contexts and a reflection on the importance of critical interpretation of policy recommendations.

Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Durham University (GB), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), College of Accounting (SI), Adam Smith Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.