In-silico credibility assessment of a computational physiological model for non-invasive monitoring of respiratory effort in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring respiratory effort in critically ill patients during assisted mechanical ventilation is essential to individualize ventilatory support and prevent over- or underassistance. A non-invasive method to estimate respiratory muscle pressure (P_mus) combines respiratory surface electromyography (sEMG) with ventilator pressure-flow waveforms through the integrated equation of motion (iEqM). Implemented within a computational physiological model (CPM), the iEqM links muscle activation to generated pressure. This study investigates the reliability of an iEqM-based CPM under critical care conditions. Approach: CPM performance to estimate respiratory muscle pressure-time product ((PTP) ̂_mus) was evaluated in-silico using simulated patient profiles. Credibility activities included numerical verification, Monte-Carlo-based uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis, exploring variations in respiratory mechanics, effort variability, sEMG signal quality, and patient-ventilator timing. Model outputs were compared with simulated reference values, with an acceptable clinical error margin set at 20%. Main results: Verification confirmed correct model implementation (errors < 0.3%). Input data uncertainty quantification showed limited variability (SD 1.8%). Sensitivity analysis revealed reduced accuracy under low P_mus variability (< 5.0 cmH₂O), low sEMG signal-to-noise ratios ((SNR) ̂ < 1.4), high P_mus magnitudes (17.5 cmH₂O), and persistent inspiratory efforts during expiration. Calibration using end-expiratory occlusion maneuvers improved accuracy, except at the lowest P_mus magnitude and (SNR) ̂s. Significance: The iEqM performs reliably when calibrated via end-expiratory occlusion maneuvers. Without calibration, accuracy declined with lower effort variability, poorer sEMG quality, or patient-ventilator asynchrony. These findings emphasize the need for context-aware application, accounting for patient-specific mechanics, signal integrity and ventilator interaction, to ensure credible and reliable monitoring of respiratory effort in critically ill patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Measurement
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/aea685
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

In-silico credibility assessment of a computational physiological model for non-invasive monitoring of respiratory effort in critically ill patients

Jan Graßhoff, Stijn Geraats, Ronald G.K.M. Aarts, Dirk W. Donker et al.
Physiological Measurement
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

In-silico credibility assessment of a computational physiological model for non-invasive monitoring of respiratory effort in critically ill patients

Jan Graßhoff, Stijn Geraats, Ronald G.K.M. Aarts, Dirk W. Donker, R. S. P. Warnaar, Eline Oppersma, Alexander D. Cornet
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring respiratory effort in critically ill patients during assisted mechanical ventilation is essential to individualize ventilatory support and prevent over- or underassistance. A non-invasive method to estimate respiratory muscle pressure (P_mus) combines respiratory surface electromyography (sEMG) with ventilator pressure-flow waveforms through the integrated equation of motion (iEqM). Implemented within a computational physiological model (CPM), the iEqM links muscle activation to generated pressure. This study investigates the reliability of an iEqM-based CPM under critical care conditions. Approach: CPM performance to estimate respiratory muscle pressure-time product ((PTP) ̂_mus) was evaluated in-silico using simulated patient profiles. Credibility activities included numerical verification, Monte-Carlo-based uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis, exploring variations in respiratory mechanics, effort variability, sEMG signal quality, and patient-ventilator timing. Model outputs were compared with simulated reference values, with an acceptable clinical error margin set at 20%. Main results: Verification confirmed correct model implementation (errors < 0.3%). Input data uncertainty quantification showed limited variability (SD 1.8%). Sensitivity analysis revealed reduced accuracy under low P_mus variability (< 5.0 cmH₂O), low sEMG signal-to-noise ratios ((SNR) ̂ < 1.4), high P_mus magnitudes (17.5 cmH₂O), and persistent inspiratory efforts during expiration. Calibration using end-expiratory occlusion maneuvers improved accuracy, except at the lowest P_mus magnitude and (SNR) ̂s. Significance: The iEqM performs reliably when calibrated via end-expiratory occlusion maneuvers. Without calibration, accuracy declined with lower effort variability, poorer sEMG quality, or patient-ventilator asynchrony. These findings emphasize the need for context-aware application, accounting for patient-specific mechanics, signal integrity and ventilator interaction, to ensure credible and reliable monitoring of respiratory effort in critically ill patients.

Physiological Measurement
Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL), Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Individualisierte Medizintechnik (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (DE), University of Twente (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.