Validation of the Opioid Risk Tool for predicting opioid use disorder in an emergency department population

The United States National Institute on Drug Abuse recommends the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) as a prognostic tool for opioid use disorder (OUD) risk stratification among patients with pain, but performance may vary over time and across populations or settings. Continuous validation is critical to avoid misguided clinical decisions. Prior validation studies were limited to assessing discrimination, which alone provides incomplete assessment of performance. We aimed to evaluate performance of the ORT for predicting OUD in a contemporary cohort with a focus on calibration and clinical utility. We used electronic health record data from an urban health system to identify patients aged ≥18 years, administered the ORT during an emergency department encounter between January 2021 and March 2023, and prescribed an opioid for pain 30 days before or after their index ORT. Our outcome of interest was incident OUD within 365 days. We assessed ORT performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration measures, and decision curve analysis to quantify clinical utility. Our study population comprised 21,266 patients. The median age was 48 years, 51% were male, 65% were racial/ethnic minorities, 12% had a history of serious mental illness, and 1.2% (n=244) were diagnosed with OUD during follow-up. The ORT had an AUC of 0.65 (95% confidence limits [CL]: 0.61, 0.69) with severe overestimation of risk, and too extreme risk estimates. The ORT had net benefit at risk thresholds below 3.5% but net harm above this threshold. The ORT had moderate discrimination, but calibration was poor. Clinical utility of the ORT is limited to an extremely cautious strategy for implementing precautionary measures and incompatible with the originally recommended threshold. Further studies should update model predictions to correct miscalibration and expand on comprehensive assessment of performance across populations and settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01769-4
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Validation of the Opioid Risk Tool for predicting opioid use disorder in an emergency department population

Mirsada Serdarevic, Caitlin T. Thompson, James P. d’Etienne, Rohit P. Ojha et al.
BMC Emergency Medicine
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Validation of the Opioid Risk Tool for predicting opioid use disorder in an emergency department population

Mirsada Serdarevic, Caitlin T. Thompson, James P. d’Etienne, Rohit P. Ojha, Dustin DeMoss, Ewout W. Steyerberg
article en

Abstract

The United States National Institute on Drug Abuse recommends the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) as a prognostic tool for opioid use disorder (OUD) risk stratification among patients with pain, but performance may vary over time and across populations or settings. Continuous validation is critical to avoid misguided clinical decisions. Prior validation studies were limited to assessing discrimination, which alone provides incomplete assessment of performance. We aimed to evaluate performance of the ORT for predicting OUD in a contemporary cohort with a focus on calibration and clinical utility. We used electronic health record data from an urban health system to identify patients aged ≥18 years, administered the ORT during an emergency department encounter between January 2021 and March 2023, and prescribed an opioid for pain 30 days before or after their index ORT. Our outcome of interest was incident OUD within 365 days. We assessed ORT performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration measures, and decision curve analysis to quantify clinical utility. Our study population comprised 21,266 patients. The median age was 48 years, 51% were male, 65% were racial/ethnic minorities, 12% had a history of serious mental illness, and 1.2% (n=244) were diagnosed with OUD during follow-up. The ORT had an AUC of 0.65 (95% confidence limits [CL]: 0.61, 0.69) with severe overestimation of risk, and too extreme risk estimates. The ORT had net benefit at risk thresholds below 3.5% but net harm above this threshold. The ORT had moderate discrimination, but calibration was poor. Clinical utility of the ORT is limited to an extremely cautious strategy for implementing precautionary measures and incompatible with the originally recommended threshold. Further studies should update model predictions to correct miscalibration and expand on comprehensive assessment of performance across populations and settings.

BMC Emergency Medicine
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), JPS Health Network (US), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.