Mastering Tradition: Desire and Overcoming in the Diamond Sūtra and the Gospel of Mark

This essay compares the Buddhist classic the Diamond Sūtra to the oldest Christian gospel, the Gospel of Mark, in order to argue that both texts work up complex “theaters of conversion” in order to encourage readers to discard previous convictions about tradition (Buddhist or Jewish/proto-Christian) so as to take the text itself, and its narrative, as the solution to all religious problems. In short, both texts appear to be knowingly designed to function as the centers of new (and rather aggressive) forms of tradition. And, in either case, it is the reader’s desire for the fullest version of tradition that is handily used to draw him or her into imagining radically revised relations with tradition and its authority figures via the reading experience. In a basic sense, then, both texts appear as portable, tradition-making machines, carrying within themselves all that is needed to reinvent tradition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17091067
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mastering Tradition: Desire and Overcoming in the Diamond Sūtra and the Gospel of Mark

Alan Cole
Religions
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Mastering Tradition: Desire and Overcoming in the Diamond Sūtra and the Gospel of Mark

Alan Cole
article en

Abstract

This essay compares the Buddhist classic the Diamond Sūtra to the oldest Christian gospel, the Gospel of Mark, in order to argue that both texts work up complex “theaters of conversion” in order to encourage readers to discard previous convictions about tradition (Buddhist or Jewish/proto-Christian) so as to take the text itself, and its narrative, as the solution to all religious problems. In short, both texts appear to be knowingly designed to function as the centers of new (and rather aggressive) forms of tradition. And, in either case, it is the reader’s desire for the fullest version of tradition that is handily used to draw him or her into imagining radically revised relations with tradition and its authority figures via the reading experience. In a basic sense, then, both texts appear as portable, tradition-making machines, carrying within themselves all that is needed to reinvent tradition.

ReligionsVol. 17(9)
Film Independent (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.