Hydrogel-based nerve conduit systems with integrated therapeutic cargo and controlled delivery strategies for peripheral nerve regeneration: a systematic preclinical review

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) with nerve gaps remain a major clinical challenge. Although autologous nerve grafting is considered the gold standard for repair, its use is limited by donor-site morbidity and limited graft availability. Recent advances in tissue engineering have led to the development of hydrogel-based nerve conduits that better mimic the natural environment for nerve regeneration. To systematically review preclinical studies using hydrogels, biologic therapies, and delivery systems for peripheral nerve repair, and evaluate their effects on nerve regeneration and functional recovery compared with autografts. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted through March 2026 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they used hydrogel-based systems incorporating therapeutic agents and engineered delivery strategies in rat sciatic nerve defect models (10–15 mm) with an autograft comparator. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively . Included studies demonstrated a consistent trend toward improved functional, electrophysiological, and histological outcomes with advanced hydrogel systems. Growth factor–based therapies were most common, often delivered via controlled, carrier-assisted, or stimuli-responsive mechanisms. Functional recovery, assessed primarily by sciatic functional index, improved substantially across studies and frequently approached autograft performance. Conductive and stimuli-responsive hydrogels further enhanced regeneration by integrating bioelectrical and dynamic release mechanisms. Multimodal delivery systems combining multiple strategies showed the most robust outcomes. Despite this, complete equivalence to autografts was not universally achieved. Notably, non-hydrogel approaches leveraging structural and electroactive design also demonstrated comparable regenerative potential. Combining hydrogel scaffolds with therapeutic biologics and controlled delivery systems may improve peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery in preclinical studies. While these approaches enhance outcomes and may approach the performance of autografts, further optimization and translational validation are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07236-x
Primary Topic
Nerve injury and regeneration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Hydrogel-based nerve conduit systems with integrated therapeutic cargo and controlled delivery strategies for peripheral nerve regeneration: a systematic preclinical review

Farid Amirouche, Mirbahador Athari, Ishani Patel, Anjani Maley
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Nerve injury and regeneration
article

Hydrogel-based nerve conduit systems with integrated therapeutic cargo and controlled delivery strategies for peripheral nerve regeneration: a systematic preclinical review

Farid Amirouche, Mirbahador Athari, Ishani Patel, Anjani Maley
article en

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) with nerve gaps remain a major clinical challenge. Although autologous nerve grafting is considered the gold standard for repair, its use is limited by donor-site morbidity and limited graft availability. Recent advances in tissue engineering have led to the development of hydrogel-based nerve conduits that better mimic the natural environment for nerve regeneration. To systematically review preclinical studies using hydrogels, biologic therapies, and delivery systems for peripheral nerve repair, and evaluate their effects on nerve regeneration and functional recovery compared with autografts. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted through March 2026 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they used hydrogel-based systems incorporating therapeutic agents and engineered delivery strategies in rat sciatic nerve defect models (10–15 mm) with an autograft comparator. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively . Included studies demonstrated a consistent trend toward improved functional, electrophysiological, and histological outcomes with advanced hydrogel systems. Growth factor–based therapies were most common, often delivered via controlled, carrier-assisted, or stimuli-responsive mechanisms. Functional recovery, assessed primarily by sciatic functional index, improved substantially across studies and frequently approached autograft performance. Conductive and stimuli-responsive hydrogels further enhanced regeneration by integrating bioelectrical and dynamic release mechanisms. Multimodal delivery systems combining multiple strategies showed the most robust outcomes. Despite this, complete equivalence to autografts was not universally achieved. Notably, non-hydrogel approaches leveraging structural and electroactive design also demonstrated comparable regenerative potential. Combining hydrogel scaffolds with therapeutic biologics and controlled delivery systems may improve peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery in preclinical studies. While these approaches enhance outcomes and may approach the performance of autografts, further optimization and translational validation are required.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
NorthShore University HealthSystem (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Nerve injury and regeneration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.