The Water Framework Directive Economics 25 years on: From Promise to Practice - and the Case for Reform

Twenty-five years ago, the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) was the first EU Directive to systematically integrate economic analysis and instruments as supporting tools intended to contribute to achieving its core environmental policy objectives: attaining good water status, reducing pollution, promoting sustainable use, and protecting and restoring aquatic ecosystems. As the original deadline for the WFD’s objectives (2027) approaches, discussions are underway on the lessons learnt and the future of EU water policy and management. This paper documents the experience of a group of water economists from a broad range of different European countries, who participated in the final adoption and first implementation steps of the economic provisions of the WFD. It analyses the role water economics has played in practice. Based on an overview of the lessons learned from their 25 years’ experience, this paper provides insights on how economics, as currently required by the WFD, could better support EU water policy and management, and what are the new and forthcoming challenges that water economics may need to respond to. The paper shows that over the past 25 years, the WFD’s implementation process has revealed a persistent structural mismatch between water policy—meant to be adaptive, integrative, and cross-sectoral—and water management, which has increasingly become an end in itself. The emergence of the EU Green Deal and the Water Resilience Initiative offer a new context to revisit and revitalize the WFD’s original ambition—aligning ambitious water policy goals with supportive and coherent water management. In line with this, this paper argues for a strategic reform of the WFD’s rules, methods, and processes to support more integrated, resilient, and future-oriented water governance—one in which economic analysis becomes a meaningful input to decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Economics and Policy
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382624x26500281
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Water Framework Directive Economics 25 years on: From Promise to Practice - and the Case for Reform

Alberto del Villar, Carlos Mario Gómez Gómez, Pierre Strosser, Daiva Semėnienė et al.
Water Economics and Policy
Water resources management and optimization
article

The Water Framework Directive Economics 25 years on: From Promise to Practice - and the Case for Reform

Alberto del Villar, Carlos Mario Gómez Gómez, Pierre Strosser, Daiva Semėnienė, Rob van der Veeren, Jonathan Fisher, Manuel Lago, Edi Interwies, Josefina Maestu
article en

Abstract

Twenty-five years ago, the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) was the first EU Directive to systematically integrate economic analysis and instruments as supporting tools intended to contribute to achieving its core environmental policy objectives: attaining good water status, reducing pollution, promoting sustainable use, and protecting and restoring aquatic ecosystems. As the original deadline for the WFD’s objectives (2027) approaches, discussions are underway on the lessons learnt and the future of EU water policy and management. This paper documents the experience of a group of water economists from a broad range of different European countries, who participated in the final adoption and first implementation steps of the economic provisions of the WFD. It analyses the role water economics has played in practice. Based on an overview of the lessons learned from their 25 years’ experience, this paper provides insights on how economics, as currently required by the WFD, could better support EU water policy and management, and what are the new and forthcoming challenges that water economics may need to respond to. The paper shows that over the past 25 years, the WFD’s implementation process has revealed a persistent structural mismatch between water policy—meant to be adaptive, integrative, and cross-sectoral—and water management, which has increasingly become an end in itself. The emergence of the EU Green Deal and the Water Resilience Initiative offer a new context to revisit and revitalize the WFD’s original ambition—aligning ambitious water policy goals with supportive and coherent water management. In line with this, this paper argues for a strategic reform of the WFD’s rules, methods, and processes to support more integrated, resilient, and future-oriented water governance—one in which economic analysis becomes a meaningful input to decision-making.

Water Economics and Policy
Twitter (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.