A Partial and Counterfactual General Equilibrium Analysis for Three Different Trade Agreements Signed by China

This study examines how three trade agreements affected China’s economy between 1990 and 2020. Using the gravity model, we investigate the following three free trade agreements: the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement, the China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement, and the China–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. We also explored (a) the partial effect and (b) the counterfactual general equilibrium consequences of these partnerships. Moreover, this research examines how these nations’ trade, salaries, and welfare have changed. With an average 80% increase in trade between members, the partial equilibrium effect of the China–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement indicates that it has had a large beneficial impact on both parties. In contrast, trade among members of the China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement and ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement has increased only moderately. However, the study of counterfactual general equilibrium indicates that the welfare impacts of the agreements are essentially insignificant, particularly in the case of the China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Economy
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2026.2730460
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Partial and Counterfactual General Equilibrium Analysis for Three Different Trade Agreements Signed by China

Mohanad Ismael, Mai Zaghal
Chinese Economy
Global trade and economics
article

A Partial and Counterfactual General Equilibrium Analysis for Three Different Trade Agreements Signed by China

Mohanad Ismael, Mai Zaghal
article en

Abstract

This study examines how three trade agreements affected China’s economy between 1990 and 2020. Using the gravity model, we investigate the following three free trade agreements: the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement, the China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement, and the China–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. We also explored (a) the partial effect and (b) the counterfactual general equilibrium consequences of these partnerships. Moreover, this research examines how these nations’ trade, salaries, and welfare have changed. With an average 80% increase in trade between members, the partial equilibrium effect of the China–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement indicates that it has had a large beneficial impact on both parties. In contrast, trade among members of the China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement and ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement has increased only moderately. However, the study of counterfactual general equilibrium indicates that the welfare impacts of the agreements are essentially insignificant, particularly in the case of the China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement.

Chinese Economy
Birzeit University (PS)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.