General Practice Utilisation for Adults With Neurological Disability Who Are National Disability Insurance Scheme Participants in Australia

ABSTRACT Most adults with neurological disability rely on general practitioners for managing and preventing health complications. This study analysed patterns of general practice service utilisation among National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) participants with neurological disability and compared these with people who are not NDIS participants, referred to as the rest of the population (ROP). Modelled annualised rates of recorded clinic and GP activity were approximately twice as high among participants with neurological disability as among the ROP (IRR range 1.87–2.28). Differences in the number of distinct GPs seen and clinics visited were smaller and condition‐specific; for example, the annualised number of distinct clinics visited was lower for participants with cerebral palsy (IRR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.81, 0.91]) and higher for participants with acquired brain injury (IRR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.01, 1.12]). Together, these findings indicate substantially higher recorded general practice activity among participants with neurological disability, while differences in the number of GPs and clinics involved in care were more modest. Investigating the factors that influence general practice service utilisation, as well as the quality and continuity of care experienced by adults with neurological disability, remains a critical area for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70138
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

General Practice Utilisation for Adults With Neurological Disability Who Are National Disability Insurance Scheme Participants in Australia

Adam McLeod, Robin A. Ramme, Di Winkler, Stacey Oliver et al.
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

General Practice Utilisation for Adults With Neurological Disability Who Are National Disability Insurance Scheme Participants in Australia

Adam McLeod, Robin A. Ramme, Di Winkler, Stacey Oliver, Karina Gardner, Stephen Weeding, Jacinta Mary Douglas, Avinash Kondiboyina, Christopher Pearce
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most adults with neurological disability rely on general practitioners for managing and preventing health complications. This study analysed patterns of general practice service utilisation among National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) participants with neurological disability and compared these with people who are not NDIS participants, referred to as the rest of the population (ROP). Modelled annualised rates of recorded clinic and GP activity were approximately twice as high among participants with neurological disability as among the ROP (IRR range 1.87–2.28). Differences in the number of distinct GPs seen and clinics visited were smaller and condition‐specific; for example, the annualised number of distinct clinics visited was lower for participants with cerebral palsy (IRR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.81, 0.91]) and higher for participants with acquired brain injury (IRR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.01, 1.12]). Together, these findings indicate substantially higher recorded general practice activity among participants with neurological disability, while differences in the number of GPs and clinics involved in care were more modest. Investigating the factors that influence general practice service utilisation, as well as the quality and continuity of care experienced by adults with neurological disability, remains a critical area for future research.

Australian Journal of Social Issues
La Trobe University (AU), Eastern Health (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.