The genetic relationships between different definitions of emissions outputs and feedlot production traits

Abstract Background Selective breeding is a potential strategy for reducing methane (CH 4 ) emissions in ruminants. In Australian beef cattle, large scale emission recording is currently being conducted using GreenFeed Emission Monitors (C-Lock Inc, USA). GreenFeeds repeatedly collect CH 4 and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) spot-samples of varying duration on attending animals. This study used emission phenotypes from Australian feedlot beef cattle to compare variance components and predictive ability of 14 different datasets. The datasets differed in the minimum duration (two- or three minutes) required of spot-samples, and the minimum number of spot-samples (one, five, ten, 15, 20, 25 or 30) required of animals, to be included in the analysis. For each data requirement, variance components were estimated for trial average CH 4 and CO 2 production and CH 4 efficiency traits, including residual CH 4 adjusted for either feed intake, average daily gain or mid-test weight; CH 4 intensity (CH 4 /mid-test weight); and CH 4 yield (CH 4 /daily feed intake). This study also examined the genetic relationships between these emission traits and feed intake, liveweight and growth in Australian feedlot beef cattle. Results Including animals with at least five spot-samples of two minutes or longer duration, when calculating trial average emission traits, performed as well as datasets with a higher minimum number of spot-samples, and better than datasets including animals with a lower minimum number of spot-samples. The required minimum duration of included spot-samples did not have systematic impacts on either variance components or predictive ability. Under the data requirement of a minimum of five, two-minute or longer spot-samples, the heritabilities of the emission traits were 0.24–0.43 (SE 0.06–0.08), with higher heritability of the emission production traits than the CH 4 efficiency traits. Feed intake, live weight and growth were moderately positive genetically correlated to CH 4 production (0.39–0.60, SE 0.08–0.14), moderately negative to moderately positive genetically correlated to the CH 4 efficiency traits (-0.27 to 0.26, SE 0.08–0.19), and moderately to highly positive genetically correlated to CO 2 production (0.54–0.88, SE 0.05–0.12). Conclusions This study showed that requiring animals to have a minimum of five spot-samples of at least two-minutes duration are appropriate data requirements for the emission data currently available on Australian feedlot beef cattle. The results further showed that feed intake, growth and liveweight had the strongest genetic relationships with CO 2 production, followed by CH 4 production, and lastly the CH 4 efficiency traits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genetics Selection Evolution
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-026-01086-1
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The genetic relationships between different definitions of emissions outputs and feedlot production traits

Mette Dam Madsen, M.N. Aldridge, S. A. Clark, R. Hergenhan et al.
Genetics Selection Evolution
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

The genetic relationships between different definitions of emissions outputs and feedlot production traits

Mette Dam Madsen, M.N. Aldridge, S. A. Clark, R. Hergenhan, T. Granleese, H. Aliloo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Selective breeding is a potential strategy for reducing methane (CH 4 ) emissions in ruminants. In Australian beef cattle, large scale emission recording is currently being conducted using GreenFeed Emission Monitors (C-Lock Inc, USA). GreenFeeds repeatedly collect CH 4 and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) spot-samples of varying duration on attending animals. This study used emission phenotypes from Australian feedlot beef cattle to compare variance components and predictive ability of 14 different datasets. The datasets differed in the minimum duration (two- or three minutes) required of spot-samples, and the minimum number of spot-samples (one, five, ten, 15, 20, 25 or 30) required of animals, to be included in the analysis. For each data requirement, variance components were estimated for trial average CH 4 and CO 2 production and CH 4 efficiency traits, including residual CH 4 adjusted for either feed intake, average daily gain or mid-test weight; CH 4 intensity (CH 4 /mid-test weight); and CH 4 yield (CH 4 /daily feed intake). This study also examined the genetic relationships between these emission traits and feed intake, liveweight and growth in Australian feedlot beef cattle. Results Including animals with at least five spot-samples of two minutes or longer duration, when calculating trial average emission traits, performed as well as datasets with a higher minimum number of spot-samples, and better than datasets including animals with a lower minimum number of spot-samples. The required minimum duration of included spot-samples did not have systematic impacts on either variance components or predictive ability. Under the data requirement of a minimum of five, two-minute or longer spot-samples, the heritabilities of the emission traits were 0.24–0.43 (SE 0.06–0.08), with higher heritability of the emission production traits than the CH 4 efficiency traits. Feed intake, live weight and growth were moderately positive genetically correlated to CH 4 production (0.39–0.60, SE 0.08–0.14), moderately negative to moderately positive genetically correlated to the CH 4 efficiency traits (-0.27 to 0.26, SE 0.08–0.19), and moderately to highly positive genetically correlated to CO 2 production (0.54–0.88, SE 0.05–0.12). Conclusions This study showed that requiring animals to have a minimum of five spot-samples of at least two-minutes duration are appropriate data requirements for the emission data currently available on Australian feedlot beef cattle. The results further showed that feed intake, growth and liveweight had the strongest genetic relationships with CO 2 production, followed by CH 4 production, and lastly the CH 4 efficiency traits.

Genetics Selection EvolutionVol. 58(1)
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU), University of New England (AU)
Meat and Livestock Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.