Forensic system bias: Systemic factors shaping digital forensic decision-making

Cognitive bias is recognised as a central human factor challenge in forensic decision-making. However, because research has mainly focused on individual-level biases, system-level perspectives of bias relating to organisational aspects such as structures, processes, and procedures, remain relatively underexamined. Drawing on data from five European countries, this empirically informed conceptual paper examines which organisational factors can introduce and reinforce bias, including cognitive bias, in the digital forensic system, thereby shaping forensic investigations and results. Based on a variety of data sources, we identify ten organisational factors related to bias and group them into three categories: structural, epistemic and competence-related, and socio-technical conditions. We argue that the conditions are interconnected, mutually reinforcing, and can give rise to systematic deviations that need to be addressed at the system level. Because complex investigative and forensic environments can create opportunities for error, addressing bias effectively requires revising the broader system in which decisions are made, alongside efforts to raise individual awareness and provide cognitive training among practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2026.302205
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forensic system bias: Systemic factors shaping digital forensic decision-making

Nina Sunde, Brita Bjørkelo, Laura vom Kolke
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Forensic system bias: Systemic factors shaping digital forensic decision-making

Nina Sunde, Brita Bjørkelo, Laura vom Kolke
article en

Abstract

Cognitive bias is recognised as a central human factor challenge in forensic decision-making. However, because research has mainly focused on individual-level biases, system-level perspectives of bias relating to organisational aspects such as structures, processes, and procedures, remain relatively underexamined. Drawing on data from five European countries, this empirically informed conceptual paper examines which organisational factors can introduce and reinforce bias, including cognitive bias, in the digital forensic system, thereby shaping forensic investigations and results. Based on a variety of data sources, we identify ten organisational factors related to bias and group them into three categories: structural, epistemic and competence-related, and socio-technical conditions. We argue that the conditions are interconnected, mutually reinforcing, and can give rise to systematic deviations that need to be addressed at the system level. Because complex investigative and forensic environments can create opportunities for error, addressing bias effectively requires revising the broader system in which decisions are made, alongside efforts to raise individual awareness and provide cognitive training among practitioners.

Forensic Science International Digital InvestigationVol. 59
Norwegian Police University College (NO)
Universitetet i Oslo
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.