Americans’ multidimensional relationship with science: Is citizen science a path forward?

Cultivating positive relationships between the public and scientific communities requires understanding how diverse populations relate to science and what strategies promote favorable outcomes. In 2021, we evaluated Americans' relationship with science by examining science beliefs (perceived credibility and value of science) and science connections (science interest, self-efficacy, belonging, and identity) using a demographically-diverse online survey of US residents (N = 1854). Most Americans expressed interest in science (60%) and believed science has value to society (68%). However, women and individuals without a graduate degree were less likely to be interested, and Black Americans were less likely to report value of science. Fewer Americans (39%) felt a sense of belonging to science and only 43% believed science was credible. Citizen science participation was a strong positive correlate of science connections and perceived value of science but inversely associated with perceived credibility of science. Approximately 14% of Americans participated in citizen science, and women, Asian, and Hispanic Americans were underrepresented. Citizen science represents a promising pathway for promoting positive views of science, but it needs to reach diverse audiences, including those already experiencing strained relationships with science, to effectively strengthen relations between science and society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357476
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Americans’ multidimensional relationship with science: Is citizen science a path forward?

Lincoln R. Larson, Brooklynn N. Joyner, K. C. Busch, Caren B. Cooper et al.
PLoS ONE
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Americans’ multidimensional relationship with science: Is citizen science a path forward?

Lincoln R. Larson, Brooklynn N. Joyner, K. C. Busch, Caren B. Cooper, Corey Johnson
article en

Abstract

Cultivating positive relationships between the public and scientific communities requires understanding how diverse populations relate to science and what strategies promote favorable outcomes. In 2021, we evaluated Americans' relationship with science by examining science beliefs (perceived credibility and value of science) and science connections (science interest, self-efficacy, belonging, and identity) using a demographically-diverse online survey of US residents (N = 1854). Most Americans expressed interest in science (60%) and believed science has value to society (68%). However, women and individuals without a graduate degree were less likely to be interested, and Black Americans were less likely to report value of science. Fewer Americans (39%) felt a sense of belonging to science and only 43% believed science was credible. Citizen science participation was a strong positive correlate of science connections and perceived value of science but inversely associated with perceived credibility of science. Approximately 14% of Americans participated in citizen science, and women, Asian, and Hispanic Americans were underrepresented. Citizen science represents a promising pathway for promoting positive views of science, but it needs to reach diverse audiences, including those already experiencing strained relationships with science, to effectively strengthen relations between science and society.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
North Carolina State University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.