Physical activity in advanced urological cancers undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a qualitative study exploring patient perspectives and experiences

PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) can improve health and treatment outcomes in cancer patients. However, patients with advanced cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy often experience debilitating side-effects that impact PA participation. Because PA experiences in patients with advanced cancer undergoing ICI therapy are not well known, in this study we aimed to explore their perceptions and lived experiences. METHOD: Twelve adults with advanced urological (bladder or renal) cancer undergoing ICI therapy at a tertiary cancer centre, London, UK, participated in individual semi-structured qualitative interviews. A topic guide facilitated discussions. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data was inductively analysed following Braun and Clarke's six-phases of Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: In-person interviews lasting 34-69 min revealed four main themes: 1) Purpose of PA participation, 2) Factors influencing PA participation (facilitators/barriers), 3) Limited ameliorative support from healthcare professionals, and 4) Desired PA support. Overall, participants reported suboptimal PA levels attributed to inadequate PA knowledge and cancer/ICI treatment-related side-effects such as fatigue and pain. PA facilitators included self-motivation, positive valance, and healthcare professionals support regarding PA benefits and safety. CONCLUSIONS: Structured PA is a promising strategy for managing cancer and treatment-related side-effects during ICI therapy; however, findings from this study indicate that it is underutilised. Patients undergoing ICI therapy have distinct PA needs, necessitating personalised support. Integrating PA interventions, such as PA counselling and timely referrals to cancer exercise/rehabilitation specialists into cancer care pathways, is essential. Further research should explore optimal strategies to enhance PA participation and maximise its benefits during ICI treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11195-8
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical activity in advanced urological cancers undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a qualitative study exploring patient perspectives and experiences

Mieke Van Hemelrijck, I. Veal, Sophia N. Karagiannis, Netty Kinsella et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Physical activity in advanced urological cancers undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a qualitative study exploring patient perspectives and experiences

Mieke Van Hemelrijck, I. Veal, Sophia N. Karagiannis, Netty Kinsella, Gareth Jones, Nicola Peat
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) can improve health and treatment outcomes in cancer patients. However, patients with advanced cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy often experience debilitating side-effects that impact PA participation. Because PA experiences in patients with advanced cancer undergoing ICI therapy are not well known, in this study we aimed to explore their perceptions and lived experiences. METHOD: Twelve adults with advanced urological (bladder or renal) cancer undergoing ICI therapy at a tertiary cancer centre, London, UK, participated in individual semi-structured qualitative interviews. A topic guide facilitated discussions. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data was inductively analysed following Braun and Clarke's six-phases of Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: In-person interviews lasting 34-69 min revealed four main themes: 1) Purpose of PA participation, 2) Factors influencing PA participation (facilitators/barriers), 3) Limited ameliorative support from healthcare professionals, and 4) Desired PA support. Overall, participants reported suboptimal PA levels attributed to inadequate PA knowledge and cancer/ICI treatment-related side-effects such as fatigue and pain. PA facilitators included self-motivation, positive valance, and healthcare professionals support regarding PA benefits and safety. CONCLUSIONS: Structured PA is a promising strategy for managing cancer and treatment-related side-effects during ICI therapy; however, findings from this study indicate that it is underutilised. Patients undergoing ICI therapy have distinct PA needs, necessitating personalised support. Integrating PA interventions, such as PA counselling and timely referrals to cancer exercise/rehabilitation specialists into cancer care pathways, is essential. Further research should explore optimal strategies to enhance PA participation and maximise its benefits during ICI treatment.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(10)
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Breast Cancer Now (GB), London Cancer (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.