Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Impact, and Response to TAVR: Insights From Egnite Data

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) frequently co-occur, complicating diagnosis and treatment. We examined current US treatment trends and patient outcomes among patients with severe AS and at least moderate MR. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 992 362 patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing 5 245 904 echocardiograms at 43 US institutions (Egnite Database; Egnite, Aliso Viejo, CA, with permissions) to identify a cohort of patients with severe AS and moderate or greater MR. The primary end point was 2-year all-cause mortality, assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis. For patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) alone, MR severity changes from baseline to 45 days post-TAVR were visualized using Sankey diagrams. RESULTS: The cohort included 36 402 patients (mean age, 78.2 years; 54.6% male), of whom 52.0% were untreated, 36.5% underwent TAVR alone, and 11.5% underwent surgery or other transcatheter interventions. Two-year mortality for untreated patients was 36.8% (95% CI, 35.6%–38.0%) for AS with less than moderate MR, 57.3% (95% CI, 54.0%–60.6%) for AS with moderate MR, and 65.5% (95% CI, 60.9%–70.1%) for AS with moderate-to-severe or severe MR (log-rank P <0.001). Undertreatment was more frequent in patients with AS and significant MR (64.5% versus 49.9%, P <0.001). Among patients undergoing TAVR alone with follow-up MR data, 77.5% demonstrated improvement in MR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with concurrent MR and AS exhibit substantially higher mortality yet have high rates of undertreatment throughout the duration of follow-up. TAVR alone significantly improves MR in most patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.126.016578
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Impact, and Response to TAVR: Insights From Egnite Data

Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Philippe Généreux, Deepak L. Bhatt, Pinak Shah et al.
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Impact, and Response to TAVR: Insights From Egnite Data

Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Philippe Généreux, Deepak L. Bhatt, Pinak Shah, Matthew Summers, Sammy Elmariah, Michael Dobbles, Benjamin E. Peterson, Santiago García, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, Brian Whisenant, Rahul Sharma
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) frequently co-occur, complicating diagnosis and treatment. We examined current US treatment trends and patient outcomes among patients with severe AS and at least moderate MR. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 992 362 patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing 5 245 904 echocardiograms at 43 US institutions (Egnite Database; Egnite, Aliso Viejo, CA, with permissions) to identify a cohort of patients with severe AS and moderate or greater MR. The primary end point was 2-year all-cause mortality, assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis. For patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) alone, MR severity changes from baseline to 45 days post-TAVR were visualized using Sankey diagrams. RESULTS: The cohort included 36 402 patients (mean age, 78.2 years; 54.6% male), of whom 52.0% were untreated, 36.5% underwent TAVR alone, and 11.5% underwent surgery or other transcatheter interventions. Two-year mortality for untreated patients was 36.8% (95% CI, 35.6%–38.0%) for AS with less than moderate MR, 57.3% (95% CI, 54.0%–60.6%) for AS with moderate MR, and 65.5% (95% CI, 60.9%–70.1%) for AS with moderate-to-severe or severe MR (log-rank P <0.001). Undertreatment was more frequent in patients with AS and significant MR (64.5% versus 49.9%, P <0.001). Among patients undergoing TAVR alone with follow-up MR data, 77.5% demonstrated improvement in MR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with concurrent MR and AS exhibit substantially higher mortality yet have high rates of undertreatment throughout the duration of follow-up. TAVR alone significantly improves MR in most patients.

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US), Morristown Medical Center (US), Intermountain Medical Center (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US), Sentara Heart Hospital (US), Christ Hospital (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Duke University Hospital (US), Christ Hospital (US), Atlantic Health System (US), Soka University of America (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.