From AI Alignment to Relational Flourishing: The Human Flourishing Framework as an Orientation for Intelligent Agency

This author-approved scholarly précis presents the Human Flourishing Framework (HFF) as a candidate orientation for artificial intelligence and, ultimately, any intelligent agency. It proposes that intelligent power should be directed toward truthful, ordered, life-giving relationships within and between nested systems, with responsibility proportionate to power. The paper summarizes HFF's documented lineage, relational architecture, constitutional constraints, operational translation, relation to contemporary AI-governance work, safeguards, limitations, and falsifiable research agenda. The underlying integrative architecture is documented from April 22, 2012; its explicit extension to AI and intelligent agency was first recorded September 4, 2026. HFF does not claim priority for AI-for-flourishing, universal validity, empirical validation, legal authority, institutional endorsement, or adoption by any AI system or developer. Version 1.0 is a citable proposal offered for independent criticism and testing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22712089
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

From AI Alignment to Relational Flourishing: The Human Flourishing Framework as an Orientation for Intelligent Agency

Christopher Ashley Cooper
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

From AI Alignment to Relational Flourishing: The Human Flourishing Framework as an Orientation for Intelligent Agency

Christopher Ashley Cooper
preprint en

Abstract

This author-approved scholarly précis presents the Human Flourishing Framework (HFF) as a candidate orientation for artificial intelligence and, ultimately, any intelligent agency. It proposes that intelligent power should be directed toward truthful, ordered, life-giving relationships within and between nested systems, with responsibility proportionate to power. The paper summarizes HFF's documented lineage, relational architecture, constitutional constraints, operational translation, relation to contemporary AI-governance work, safeguards, limitations, and falsifiable research agenda. The underlying integrative architecture is documented from April 22, 2012; its explicit extension to AI and intelligent agency was first recorded September 4, 2026. HFF does not claim priority for AI-for-flourishing, universal validity, empirical validation, legal authority, institutional endorsement, or adoption by any AI system or developer. Version 1.0 is a citable proposal offered for independent criticism and testing.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.