Opportunities to maximise the safety benefits of ADAS: A mixed-methods study of self-reported driver understanding, trust and behavioural adaptation

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) have been shown in numerous studies to be effective in reducing road trauma. However, the magnitude of their realised safety benefits depends on how drivers understand, engage with, and respond to these technologies. This study used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design to examine drivers' engagement with 17 current-generation ADAS functions. Four online focus groups ( N = 33; M age = 43 years, SD = 14; 58% women) explored everyday experiences with ADAS, the insights from which informed an online survey of drivers across Australia ( N = 842; M age = 52 years, SD = 16; 88% men) whose vehicles (model years 2018–2023; average vehicle age = 2.2 years, SD = 1.67) were equipped with at least one of the 17 systems. Topics examined included awareness and self-rated understanding of ADAS, sources of information, trust and acceptability, and self-reported behavioural adaptation (unintended negative consequences of ADAS use) when systems were active. Findings showed that driver understanding of ADAS functionality relied heavily on trial-and-error learning and informal online sources for information. Dealership-provided information was reported infrequently. Awareness and self-rated understanding were highest for established and more salient systems such as blind spot monitoring and lane departure warning, and lowest for newer or less visible systems such as automated emergency steering. Trust and acceptability mirrored these patterns, with lateral automated vehicle control systems attracting lower confidence than longitudinal control systems. Although most drivers denied behavioural change in response to ADAS fitment, some reported reduced situational awareness, fewer blind-spot checks, increased reliance on ADAS, or greater engagement in secondary tasks. Younger drivers reported more behavioural adaptation than older drivers. Overall, the study highlights persistent gaps in drivers' understanding of ADAS. Enhancing the clarity, accessibility, and standardisation of ADAS information may improve trust calibration, support safer engagement, and maximise the safety benefits of ADAS.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2026.103817
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Opportunities to maximise the safety benefits of ADAS: A mixed-methods study of self-reported driver understanding, trust and behavioural adaptation

Marilyn Di Stefano, Casey Rampollard, Fareed Kaviani, R. Crotty et al.
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Opportunities to maximise the safety benefits of ADAS: A mixed-methods study of self-reported driver understanding, trust and behavioural adaptation

Marilyn Di Stefano, Casey Rampollard, Fareed Kaviani, R. Crotty, Amanda N. Stephens, Kristie L. Young, Stuart V. Newstead, Christine Mulvihill
article en

Abstract

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) have been shown in numerous studies to be effective in reducing road trauma. However, the magnitude of their realised safety benefits depends on how drivers understand, engage with, and respond to these technologies. This study used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design to examine drivers' engagement with 17 current-generation ADAS functions. Four online focus groups ( N = 33; M age = 43 years, SD = 14; 58% women) explored everyday experiences with ADAS, the insights from which informed an online survey of drivers across Australia ( N = 842; M age = 52 years, SD = 16; 88% men) whose vehicles (model years 2018–2023; average vehicle age = 2.2 years, SD = 1.67) were equipped with at least one of the 17 systems. Topics examined included awareness and self-rated understanding of ADAS, sources of information, trust and acceptability, and self-reported behavioural adaptation (unintended negative consequences of ADAS use) when systems were active. Findings showed that driver understanding of ADAS functionality relied heavily on trial-and-error learning and informal online sources for information. Dealership-provided information was reported infrequently. Awareness and self-rated understanding were highest for established and more salient systems such as blind spot monitoring and lane departure warning, and lowest for newer or less visible systems such as automated emergency steering. Trust and acceptability mirrored these patterns, with lateral automated vehicle control systems attracting lower confidence than longitudinal control systems. Although most drivers denied behavioural change in response to ADAS fitment, some reported reduced situational awareness, fewer blind-spot checks, increased reliance on ADAS, or greater engagement in secondary tasks. Younger drivers reported more behavioural adaptation than older drivers. Overall, the study highlights persistent gaps in drivers' understanding of ADAS. Enhancing the clarity, accessibility, and standardisation of ADAS information may improve trust calibration, support safer engagement, and maximise the safety benefits of ADAS.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 123
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.