Trade frictions and corporate social responsibility (CSR): evidence from the risk mitigation perspective

This paper applies resource-based theory and stakeholder theory to examine trade frictions as a motive for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Using trade remedy investigations as a proxy for trade friction, we find that trade frictions increase CSR engagement, and this effect is stronger for firms in highly competitive industries, SOE firms, and those located in provinces with low levels of social trust. A motivation-based mechanism analysis shows that trade frictions increase firms’ business risk, which strengthens incentives to engage in CSR as a risk-management response. The positive effect of trade frictions on CSR is stronger among high-risk firms, and CSR engagement subsequently reduces future business risk. Moreover, this effect is weakened for firms with higher levels of digital transformation or innovation investment, suggesting that CSR operates as one of several alternative strategies for managing trade-friction risks. Additional tests show that trade frictions reduce corporate value, while proactive CSR engagement can offset this negative effect. Overall, the findings indicate that trade frictions stimulate CSR engagement and provide new insights into the literature on the determinants of CSR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08983-2
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade frictions and corporate social responsibility (CSR): evidence from the risk mitigation perspective

Xiangyu Chen, Peng Wan, Jingli Hao
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Trade frictions and corporate social responsibility (CSR): evidence from the risk mitigation perspective

Xiangyu Chen, Peng Wan, Jingli Hao
article en

Abstract

This paper applies resource-based theory and stakeholder theory to examine trade frictions as a motive for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Using trade remedy investigations as a proxy for trade friction, we find that trade frictions increase CSR engagement, and this effect is stronger for firms in highly competitive industries, SOE firms, and those located in provinces with low levels of social trust. A motivation-based mechanism analysis shows that trade frictions increase firms’ business risk, which strengthens incentives to engage in CSR as a risk-management response. The positive effect of trade frictions on CSR is stronger among high-risk firms, and CSR engagement subsequently reduces future business risk. Moreover, this effect is weakened for firms with higher levels of digital transformation or innovation investment, suggesting that CSR operates as one of several alternative strategies for managing trade-friction risks. Additional tests show that trade frictions reduce corporate value, while proactive CSR engagement can offset this negative effect. Overall, the findings indicate that trade frictions stimulate CSR engagement and provide new insights into the literature on the determinants of CSR.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Zhejiang Gongshang University (CN), Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.