CHALLENGES IN INSURING AGAINST CATASTROPHIC RISKS

This paper addresses the key challenges in insuring against catastrophic risks, with a particular focus on flood risk as one of the most complex and economically significant natural hazards in contemporary conditions. These challenges stem from the increasing frequency and severity of extreme events, the spatial and temporal correlation of losses, high loss severity, as well as methodological difficulties in risk measurement and persistent institutional and market constraints reflected in the protection gap between economic and insured losses. The paper examines the extent to which different flood insurance models can contribute to addressing these challenges. The findings indicate that no single institutional model provides a universally optimal solution. While public models improve accessibility and social protection, and private models enhance risk-based pricing and efficiency, both exhibit significant limitations when applied in isolation. Public–private arrangements, when supported by robust risk assessment and a clear allocation of responsibilities, offer the greatest potential to reduce the protection gap and ensure more sustainable, resilient financial protection against flood losses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
НОВИ ЕКОНОМИСТ
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69781/noek202640010
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

CHALLENGES IN INSURING AGAINST CATASTROPHIC RISKS

Marija Koprivica, Nataša Tešić, Jelena Kočović
НОВИ ЕКОНОМИСТ
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

CHALLENGES IN INSURING AGAINST CATASTROPHIC RISKS

Marija Koprivica, Nataša Tešić, Jelena Kočović
article en

Abstract

This paper addresses the key challenges in insuring against catastrophic risks, with a particular focus on flood risk as one of the most complex and economically significant natural hazards in contemporary conditions. These challenges stem from the increasing frequency and severity of extreme events, the spatial and temporal correlation of losses, high loss severity, as well as methodological difficulties in risk measurement and persistent institutional and market constraints reflected in the protection gap between economic and insured losses. The paper examines the extent to which different flood insurance models can contribute to addressing these challenges. The findings indicate that no single institutional model provides a universally optimal solution. While public models improve accessibility and social protection, and private models enhance risk-based pricing and efficiency, both exhibit significant limitations when applied in isolation. Public–private arrangements, when supported by robust risk assessment and a clear allocation of responsibilities, offer the greatest potential to reduce the protection gap and ensure more sustainable, resilient financial protection against flood losses.

НОВИ ЕКОНОМИСТVol. 20(40)
University of East Sarajevo (BA), University of Belgrade (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CHALLENGES IN INSURING AGAINST CATASTROPHIC RISKS — Marija Koprivica, Nataša Tešić, et al. · НОВИ ЕКОНОМИСТ (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS