Beef Quality Under Different Ageing Conditions: Physical, Chemical, Technological, and Sensory Evaluation

Ageing is a key post-mortem process affecting beef quality; however, alternative fat-coating methods remain insufficiently understood. This study compared wet ageing (WA), dry ageing (DA), butter ageing (BA), and tallow ageing (TA) in terms of their effects on physicochemical, technological, and sensory characteristics. Longissimus lumborum muscles from Fleckvieh heifers were aged for 50 days under controlled conditions: WA samples were vacuum-packed, DA samples were stored bone-in, and BA and TA samples were coated with butter or rendered tallow. Instrumental quality analyses and descriptive sensory evaluation by a trained panel were performed. Ageing significantly improved tenderness in all treatments, reducing the Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) from 55.8 N in fresh meat to 35.1–39.9 N after 50 days of ageing. However, tenderness did not differ significantly among the ageing methods. Meanwhile, pH increased and myofibrillar fragmentation progressed during ageing. The BA and TA samples exhibited higher scores for sour and atypical sensory notes. DA samples were also perceived as juicier than the other treatments. Overall, although all methods produced acceptable tenderness, conventional ageing, particularly dry ageing, provided superior sensory quality. Utilising butter or tallow coating during beef ageing did not enhance flavour development, and may negatively affect sensory profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16189041
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Beef Quality Under Different Ageing Conditions: Physical, Chemical, Technological, and Sensory Evaluation

Tersia Needham, Daniel Bureš, Louwrens C. Hoffman, Eva Kudrnáčová et al.
Applied Sciences
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Beef Quality Under Different Ageing Conditions: Physical, Chemical, Technological, and Sensory Evaluation

Tersia Needham, Daniel Bureš, Louwrens C. Hoffman, Eva Kudrnáčová, Patrik Kosztolányi
article en

Abstract

Ageing is a key post-mortem process affecting beef quality; however, alternative fat-coating methods remain insufficiently understood. This study compared wet ageing (WA), dry ageing (DA), butter ageing (BA), and tallow ageing (TA) in terms of their effects on physicochemical, technological, and sensory characteristics. Longissimus lumborum muscles from Fleckvieh heifers were aged for 50 days under controlled conditions: WA samples were vacuum-packed, DA samples were stored bone-in, and BA and TA samples were coated with butter or rendered tallow. Instrumental quality analyses and descriptive sensory evaluation by a trained panel were performed. Ageing significantly improved tenderness in all treatments, reducing the Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) from 55.8 N in fresh meat to 35.1–39.9 N after 50 days of ageing. However, tenderness did not differ significantly among the ageing methods. Meanwhile, pH increased and myofibrillar fragmentation progressed during ageing. The BA and TA samples exhibited higher scores for sour and atypical sensory notes. DA samples were also perceived as juicier than the other treatments. Overall, although all methods produced acceptable tenderness, conventional ageing, particularly dry ageing, provided superior sensory quality. Utilising butter or tallow coating during beef ageing did not enhance flavour development, and may negatively affect sensory profiles.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(18)
The University of Queensland (AU), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Institute of Animal Science (CZ), Agriculture and Food (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture (AU)
Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan, European Commission, Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy, Česká Zemědělská Univerzita v Praze
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.