Attitudes, perceptions, and ethical concerns of dental students toward artificial intelligence: a cross-sectional survey study

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to evaluate dental students’ knowledge, usage habits, attitudes, and ethical approaches toward artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, and to examine whether these approaches differ according to gender and stage of education (preclinical/clinical). Methods A total of 327 dental students completed an online questionnaire comprising, in addition to sociodemographic characteristics, four sections on knowledge of AI, patterns of use, clinical attitudes, and ethical perspectives. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson chi-square test; where the expected cell frequency assumption was not met, p values were derived by Monte Carlo simulation. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Of the participants, 73.1% stated that AI could lead to significant advances in the fields of dentistry and medicine. Students reported that they acquired their knowledge of AI predominantly from social media and the internet (79.2%) and that they most frequently used ChatGPT (67.6%). The proportion of those who considered AI diagnosis to be as reliable as a dentist’s diagnosis remained at 13.1%. In comparisons by gender, concerns regarding personal privacy/data security, patient confidentiality, and the negative impact on the dentist-patient relationship were reported at higher rates among female students ( p = 0.004; p = 0.013; p = 0.002, respectively); opinions regarding the reliability of AI diagnosis also differed by gender ( p = 0.014). According to stage of education, significant differences were found in terms of the preferred source of trust in the case of a dentist–AI conflict (Monte Carlo p = 0.002), the inclusion of AI courses in the curriculum ( p = 0.004), and the necessity of informing patients ( p = 0.001). Conclusions Although dental students generally have a positive approach toward AI, they report various reservations in the areas of trust, privacy, and ethical responsibility. The findings suggest that integrating structured educational content on AI technologies and their ethical and clinical limitations into the dental curriculum may be beneficial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10369-6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Attitudes, perceptions, and ethical concerns of dental students toward artificial intelligence: a cross-sectional survey study

Hayri Akman, Koray Sürme, Ceren Gümüş Saka, Selin Başakcı
BMC Medical Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Attitudes, perceptions, and ethical concerns of dental students toward artificial intelligence: a cross-sectional survey study

Hayri Akman, Koray Sürme, Ceren Gümüş Saka, Selin Başakcı
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to evaluate dental students’ knowledge, usage habits, attitudes, and ethical approaches toward artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, and to examine whether these approaches differ according to gender and stage of education (preclinical/clinical). Methods A total of 327 dental students completed an online questionnaire comprising, in addition to sociodemographic characteristics, four sections on knowledge of AI, patterns of use, clinical attitudes, and ethical perspectives. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson chi-square test; where the expected cell frequency assumption was not met, p values were derived by Monte Carlo simulation. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Of the participants, 73.1% stated that AI could lead to significant advances in the fields of dentistry and medicine. Students reported that they acquired their knowledge of AI predominantly from social media and the internet (79.2%) and that they most frequently used ChatGPT (67.6%). The proportion of those who considered AI diagnosis to be as reliable as a dentist’s diagnosis remained at 13.1%. In comparisons by gender, concerns regarding personal privacy/data security, patient confidentiality, and the negative impact on the dentist-patient relationship were reported at higher rates among female students ( p = 0.004; p = 0.013; p = 0.002, respectively); opinions regarding the reliability of AI diagnosis also differed by gender ( p = 0.014). According to stage of education, significant differences were found in terms of the preferred source of trust in the case of a dentist–AI conflict (Monte Carlo p = 0.002), the inclusion of AI courses in the curriculum ( p = 0.004), and the necessity of informing patients ( p = 0.001). Conclusions Although dental students generally have a positive approach toward AI, they report various reservations in the areas of trust, privacy, and ethical responsibility. The findings suggest that integrating structured educational content on AI technologies and their ethical and clinical limitations into the dental curriculum may be beneficial.

BMC Medical Education
Alanya University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.