A mammographic habitat–clinical fusion model for the preoperative prediction of ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a preinvasive stage of breast cancer, whereas DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-Mi) has greater metastatic potential and necessitates distinct therapeutic strategies. The precise preoperative differentiation of these conditions remains a critical challenge in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel multimodal model integrating mammographic habitat heterogeneity analysis with clinical parameters for distinguishing DCIS from DCIS-Mi preoperatively. In this multicentre retrospective analysis, 255 patients with pathologically confirmed breast lesions (248 unilateral and 7 bilateral) were included. The cohort was stratified into training (70%) and internal validation (30%) sets, with two external test cohorts used for generalizability assessment. Mammographic ROIs on craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views were annotated by two board-certified radiologists. A habitat-driven radiomics pipeline yielding 833 quantitative features characterizing tumour heterogeneity and peritumoral microenvironment attributes was applied. LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation was used to select the optimal features. Three machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, LightGBM, and ExtraTrees) were compared. All lesions from the same patient were assigned to the same cohort to prevent information leakage. The ExtraTrees classifier demonstrated superior discriminative performance on the internal validation set (AUC: 0.822; 95% CI: 0.694–0.950), significantly outperforming the logistic regression (AUC: 0.649; p < 0.01) and LightGBM (AUC: 0.705; p = 0.03) models. Integrating clinical variables with habitat features in a fusion model enhanced performance, yielding AUCs of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.704–0.957) on the internal validation set and 0.907 (95% CI: 0.816–0.997) on the external Test 2 cohort. In this study, we developed a framework that combines mammographic habitat signatures with clinical metadata for improved preoperative risk stratification of DCIS-Mi. The model demonstrates promising performance and interpretability; however, prospective validation is required before clinical translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03776-8
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mammographic habitat–clinical fusion model for the preoperative prediction of ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

Weikang Huang, Guoyan Yao, Xiayu Yu, Xiaojing Shang et al.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

A mammographic habitat–clinical fusion model for the preoperative prediction of ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

Weikang Huang, Guoyan Yao, Xiayu Yu, Xiaojing Shang, Lei Guo, Minan Zheng, Xia Zhou, Lijun Chen, Yan Huang
article en

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a preinvasive stage of breast cancer, whereas DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-Mi) has greater metastatic potential and necessitates distinct therapeutic strategies. The precise preoperative differentiation of these conditions remains a critical challenge in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel multimodal model integrating mammographic habitat heterogeneity analysis with clinical parameters for distinguishing DCIS from DCIS-Mi preoperatively. In this multicentre retrospective analysis, 255 patients with pathologically confirmed breast lesions (248 unilateral and 7 bilateral) were included. The cohort was stratified into training (70%) and internal validation (30%) sets, with two external test cohorts used for generalizability assessment. Mammographic ROIs on craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views were annotated by two board-certified radiologists. A habitat-driven radiomics pipeline yielding 833 quantitative features characterizing tumour heterogeneity and peritumoral microenvironment attributes was applied. LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation was used to select the optimal features. Three machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, LightGBM, and ExtraTrees) were compared. All lesions from the same patient were assigned to the same cohort to prevent information leakage. The ExtraTrees classifier demonstrated superior discriminative performance on the internal validation set (AUC: 0.822; 95% CI: 0.694–0.950), significantly outperforming the logistic regression (AUC: 0.649; p < 0.01) and LightGBM (AUC: 0.705; p = 0.03) models. Integrating clinical variables with habitat features in a fusion model enhanced performance, yielding AUCs of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.704–0.957) on the internal validation set and 0.907 (95% CI: 0.816–0.997) on the external Test 2 cohort. In this study, we developed a framework that combines mammographic habitat signatures with clinical metadata for improved preoperative risk stratification of DCIS-Mi. The model demonstrates promising performance and interpretability; however, prospective validation is required before clinical translation.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.