Clean cooking and cook stove interventions in Africa: a scoping review of exposure contrasts and future steps

In Africa, solid biomass fuels are widely used for household cooking, heating, and lighting, generating hazardous levels of household air pollution (HAP), including fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), black carbon (BC), and carbon monoxide (CO). Inhalation of these pollutants is associated with adverse health outcomes. Women of childbearing age and young children experience the highest exposures due to their disproportionate time spent cooking and performing household activities. To mitigate these risks, interventions such as cleaner fuels and improved cook stove technologies have been promoted. However, evidence on their effectiveness in reducing pollutant exposure and improving health outcomes in African households remains fragmented, highlighting the need for a scoping review focused on the African context, where reliance on solid fuels is particularly high. To synthesize existing evidence and identify knowledge gaps through a scoping review of cleaner fuel and modified cook stove interventions in African households, examining changes in PM₂.₅, BC, and CO concentrations in cooking areas and/or personal exposures compared with traditional cooking methods. This review was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/thwsf/ ). We conducted a systematic search of Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and CAB Abstracts. Eligible studies were intervention studies conducted in Africa that reported pre- and post-intervention household air pollution measurements. Study selection and data extraction followed JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, using Colandr. The review mapped available evidence on reductions in household air pollution associated with cleaner fuel and cookstove interventions. Key gaps were identified, including limited assessment of pollutants beyond PM₂.₅, BC, and CO; inconsistent use of personal exposure measurements; uneven geographic representation across African regions; and scarce evidence on long-term effectiveness or direct links between interventions and health outcomes. This scoping review provides a comprehensive synthesis of evidence on clean cooking interventions in Africa and highlights critical research gaps. Addressing these gaps is essential to guide effective interventions, inform policy, and reduce household air pollution exposures among vulnerable populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29114-1
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Clean cooking and cook stove interventions in Africa: a scoping review of exposure contrasts and future steps

Maggie L. Clark, Ajay Pillarisetti, Egide Kalisa, Miles A. Kirby et al.
BMC Public Health
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Clean cooking and cook stove interventions in Africa: a scoping review of exposure contrasts and future steps

Maggie L. Clark, Ajay Pillarisetti, Egide Kalisa, Miles A. Kirby, Jennifer L. Peel, Patrick Karakwende, Lance Waller, Bonnie N. Young, Adolphe Ndikubwimana, Theoneste Ntakirutimana, Ghislaine Rosa, Michael Johnson
article en

Abstract

In Africa, solid biomass fuels are widely used for household cooking, heating, and lighting, generating hazardous levels of household air pollution (HAP), including fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), black carbon (BC), and carbon monoxide (CO). Inhalation of these pollutants is associated with adverse health outcomes. Women of childbearing age and young children experience the highest exposures due to their disproportionate time spent cooking and performing household activities. To mitigate these risks, interventions such as cleaner fuels and improved cook stove technologies have been promoted. However, evidence on their effectiveness in reducing pollutant exposure and improving health outcomes in African households remains fragmented, highlighting the need for a scoping review focused on the African context, where reliance on solid fuels is particularly high. To synthesize existing evidence and identify knowledge gaps through a scoping review of cleaner fuel and modified cook stove interventions in African households, examining changes in PM₂.₅, BC, and CO concentrations in cooking areas and/or personal exposures compared with traditional cooking methods. This review was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/thwsf/ ). We conducted a systematic search of Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and CAB Abstracts. Eligible studies were intervention studies conducted in Africa that reported pre- and post-intervention household air pollution measurements. Study selection and data extraction followed JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, using Colandr. The review mapped available evidence on reductions in household air pollution associated with cleaner fuel and cookstove interventions. Key gaps were identified, including limited assessment of pollutants beyond PM₂.₅, BC, and CO; inconsistent use of personal exposure measurements; uneven geographic representation across African regions; and scarce evidence on long-term effectiveness or direct links between interventions and health outcomes. This scoping review provides a comprehensive synthesis of evidence on clean cooking interventions in Africa and highlights critical research gaps. Addressing these gaps is essential to guide effective interventions, inform policy, and reduce household air pollution exposures among vulnerable populations.

BMC Public Health
Western University (CA), Harvard University (US), University of Liverpool (GB), Emory University (US), University of Kigali (RW), Berkeley Air Monitoring Group (United States) (US), University of Global Health Equity (RW), Rwanda Biomedical Center (RW), Colorado State University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.