Territorial autonomy as territorial reordering: sequencing post-conflict governance in Aceh and Mindanao

Territorial autonomy can stabilise post-conflict orders under specific institutional and territorial conditions. Conceptualising autonomy as uneven territorial reordering, this article identifies five determinants shaping whether autonomy reduces or reallocates violence: external guarantees, legal codification, demilitarisation, inclusive governance and fiscal redistribution. Through process tracing of Aceh and Mindanao, the article argues that autonomy stabilises peace when these domains are sequenced as mutually reinforcing mechanisms, but becomes fragile when implementation is asynchronous. By linking credible-commitment theory with institutional peacebuilding, the study explains how autonomy stabilises negotiated settlements and reorders authority, coercion, representation and resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Territory Politics Governance
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2026.2726971
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Territorial autonomy as territorial reordering: sequencing post-conflict governance in Aceh and Mindanao

Miyoko Taniguchi
Territory Politics Governance
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Territorial autonomy as territorial reordering: sequencing post-conflict governance in Aceh and Mindanao

Miyoko Taniguchi
article en

Abstract

Territorial autonomy can stabilise post-conflict orders under specific institutional and territorial conditions. Conceptualising autonomy as uneven territorial reordering, this article identifies five determinants shaping whether autonomy reduces or reallocates violence: external guarantees, legal codification, demilitarisation, inclusive governance and fiscal redistribution. Through process tracing of Aceh and Mindanao, the article argues that autonomy stabilises peace when these domains are sequenced as mutually reinforcing mechanisms, but becomes fragile when implementation is asynchronous. By linking credible-commitment theory with institutional peacebuilding, the study explains how autonomy stabilises negotiated settlements and reorders authority, coercion, representation and resources.

Territory Politics Governance
Miyazaki Municipal University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.