Executive‐Reported Organizational AI Implementation Intention: Evidence From Firms Without Recognized Routine AI Implementation

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly considered in organizational decisions involving business processes, resource use, governance, and competitive positioning. This study examines executive‐reported organizational AI implementation intention among firms with no stable, continuous, and organizationally recognized routine AI implementation. This condition does not exclude pilot activity, sporadic experimentation, or informal use. The model includes nine first‐order antecedents drawn from technology acceptance, innovation diffusion, and research on trust, perceived costs, and anxiety. Survey data from 613 top executives in Spain and Portugal are analyzed using PLS‐SEM and necessary condition analysis. Permutation‐based path comparisons identify a between‐sample difference only for facilitating conditions. All seven positively framed antecedents show significant necessity effects in both samples. Cost frictions and AI anxiety are negatively associated with intention in both countries but are not necessary conditions. The study clarifies how established antecedents occupy different net association and necessity roles in executive‐reported organizational AI implementation intention. The findings illuminate a prospective organizational context relevant to sustainable digital transformation, without assessing realized implementation, governance practices, or sustainability outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71539
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Executive‐Reported Organizational AI Implementation Intention: Evidence From Firms Without Recognized Routine AI Implementation

Ana María Casado Molina, Juan-Pedro Cabrera-Sánchez, Célia M. Q. Ramos, Luis‐Alfonso Maldonado‐Canca
Business Strategy and the Environment
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Executive‐Reported Organizational AI Implementation Intention: Evidence From Firms Without Recognized Routine AI Implementation

Ana María Casado Molina, Juan-Pedro Cabrera-Sánchez, Célia M. Q. Ramos, Luis‐Alfonso Maldonado‐Canca
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly considered in organizational decisions involving business processes, resource use, governance, and competitive positioning. This study examines executive‐reported organizational AI implementation intention among firms with no stable, continuous, and organizationally recognized routine AI implementation. This condition does not exclude pilot activity, sporadic experimentation, or informal use. The model includes nine first‐order antecedents drawn from technology acceptance, innovation diffusion, and research on trust, perceived costs, and anxiety. Survey data from 613 top executives in Spain and Portugal are analyzed using PLS‐SEM and necessary condition analysis. Permutation‐based path comparisons identify a between‐sample difference only for facilitating conditions. All seven positively framed antecedents show significant necessity effects in both samples. Cost frictions and AI anxiety are negatively associated with intention in both countries but are not necessary conditions. The study clarifies how established antecedents occupy different net association and necessity roles in executive‐reported organizational AI implementation intention. The findings illuminate a prospective organizational context relevant to sustainable digital transformation, without assessing realized implementation, governance practices, or sustainability outcomes.

Business Strategy and the Environment
University of Algarve (PT), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.