Training and capacity building for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in low- and middle-income countries: gaps and context-specific strategies — a scoping review

Abstract Background Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) offers a variety of interventions in managing biliopancreatic disorders, but it is associated with a high risk of adverse events. Therefore, training is typically conducted through formal gastroenterology fellowships in high-volume centres, but may also occur informally in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Aims This scoping review seeks to understand the training methods available to ERCP trainees and the methods used to assess their competence, particularly in LMICs. Methods We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus from 2005 to August 2025, and performed a complementary Grey literature search. We included studies published in English that referenced recommendations from endoscopic societies or national accrediting bodies, and those that described ERCP training and the assessment of technical competence. Data were extracted and summarised. Results The review identified 55 articles, including 7 recommendations from endoscopic societies and accreditation bodies. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were poorly represented, with only one guideline retrieved from an upper-middle-income country accreditation body. We identified eight competence assessment tools: five qualitative, one self-assessment, and two quantitative. None of the recommendations from LMICs included guidance on formal competence assessment, and no studies from these settings reported on the use of simulator-based training. The expansion of ERCP services in LMICs has relied on short-term apprenticeship training with mentorship, intermittent expert visits supported by telemedicine, and outreach placements at high-volume centres before returning to local practice. Conclusions The underrepresentation of low- and middle-income countries in ERCP training, guideline development, and competence assessment highlights an urgent need for context-specific frameworks. Establishing such guidelines in resource-limited settings is essential to enhance patient safety and provide a foundation for expanding ERCP services where they currently do not exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05325-z
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Training and capacity building for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in low- and middle-income countries: gaps and context-specific strategies — a scoping review

OO Jolayemi, LC Ferndale, J Buitendag
BMC Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Training and capacity building for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in low- and middle-income countries: gaps and context-specific strategies — a scoping review

OO Jolayemi, LC Ferndale, J Buitendag
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) offers a variety of interventions in managing biliopancreatic disorders, but it is associated with a high risk of adverse events. Therefore, training is typically conducted through formal gastroenterology fellowships in high-volume centres, but may also occur informally in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Aims This scoping review seeks to understand the training methods available to ERCP trainees and the methods used to assess their competence, particularly in LMICs. Methods We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus from 2005 to August 2025, and performed a complementary Grey literature search. We included studies published in English that referenced recommendations from endoscopic societies or national accrediting bodies, and those that described ERCP training and the assessment of technical competence. Data were extracted and summarised. Results The review identified 55 articles, including 7 recommendations from endoscopic societies and accreditation bodies. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were poorly represented, with only one guideline retrieved from an upper-middle-income country accreditation body. We identified eight competence assessment tools: five qualitative, one self-assessment, and two quantitative. None of the recommendations from LMICs included guidance on formal competence assessment, and no studies from these settings reported on the use of simulator-based training. The expansion of ERCP services in LMICs has relied on short-term apprenticeship training with mentorship, intermittent expert visits supported by telemedicine, and outreach placements at high-volume centres before returning to local practice. Conclusions The underrepresentation of low- and middle-income countries in ERCP training, guideline development, and competence assessment highlights an urgent need for context-specific frameworks. Establishing such guidelines in resource-limited settings is essential to enhance patient safety and provide a foundation for expanding ERCP services where they currently do not exist.

BMC Gastroenterology
Stellenbosch University (ZA), Tygerberg Hospital (ZA), Grey's Hospital (ZA), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.