Automated Case Logging for Surgical Residency Training Using the Electronic Health Record: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Case logging is essential for competency-based evaluation in residency but requires manual entry, which is susceptible to error, leading to delayed submission and underreporting. We present a novel, fully automated electronic health record (EHR)-integrated platform that extracts data from clinical documentation and logs it into the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an automated EHR extraction and case-logging system linked to the ACGME. METHODS: We evaluated case logs from 20 residents (post-graduate year 1-7) at an academic neurosurgery department from June to September 2025. Automated case logs were extracted from our digital EHR data warehouse, current procedural terminology codes were mapped to procedure code IDs, and residents verified automated logs before ACGME transmission. Manual case logs were extracted from operative reports in Epic by 2 staff members for comparison. Accuracy, precision, and sensitivity were assessed by comparing automated logs against manual logs. Time savings was estimated by comparing manual and automated per case-logging time across clinical residency years. RESULTS: A total of 1977 cases were automatically pulled compared with 2041 cases pulled from manual chart review. After review by each resident, 1955 of the automatically pulled cases were correctly logged and categorized when compared with manual cases (94.8% accuracy), with a 98.9% precision and 95.8% sensitivity. Traditional self-reported case logging took, on average, 199.9 ± 99.1 seconds per case. In comparison, reviewing and confirming automated case logs required an average of 68.4 ± 75.1 seconds per case. Per ACGME case minimums, automated logging reduced time by 66%, saving a neurosurgical resident 58 hours over the course of 5 operative, clinical years. CONCLUSION: Automated case logs provide an accurate, time-effective tool that can reduce administrative burden. Future studies should evaluate how to further improve and broaden the application of automated case logs to other specialties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000004210
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Automated Case Logging for Surgical Residency Training Using the Electronic Health Record: A Pilot Study

John Patrick T. Co, Mercy H. Mazurek, Pranav Nanda, Edwin Owolo et al.
Neurosurgery
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Automated Case Logging for Surgical Residency Training Using the Electronic Health Record: A Pilot Study

John Patrick T. Co, Mercy H. Mazurek, Pranav Nanda, Edwin Owolo, Kai U. Frerichs, Ganesh Shankar, Brian V. Nahed, Jean-Valery Coumans, Amanda Tan, Katie Roche, Christopher Buliga, William T. Curry, Christopher J. Stapleton, Pamela S. Jones, Lori Berkowitz, Adam Landman, Michael Ricci
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Case logging is essential for competency-based evaluation in residency but requires manual entry, which is susceptible to error, leading to delayed submission and underreporting. We present a novel, fully automated electronic health record (EHR)-integrated platform that extracts data from clinical documentation and logs it into the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an automated EHR extraction and case-logging system linked to the ACGME. METHODS: We evaluated case logs from 20 residents (post-graduate year 1-7) at an academic neurosurgery department from June to September 2025. Automated case logs were extracted from our digital EHR data warehouse, current procedural terminology codes were mapped to procedure code IDs, and residents verified automated logs before ACGME transmission. Manual case logs were extracted from operative reports in Epic by 2 staff members for comparison. Accuracy, precision, and sensitivity were assessed by comparing automated logs against manual logs. Time savings was estimated by comparing manual and automated per case-logging time across clinical residency years. RESULTS: A total of 1977 cases were automatically pulled compared with 2041 cases pulled from manual chart review. After review by each resident, 1955 of the automatically pulled cases were correctly logged and categorized when compared with manual cases (94.8% accuracy), with a 98.9% precision and 95.8% sensitivity. Traditional self-reported case logging took, on average, 199.9 ± 99.1 seconds per case. In comparison, reviewing and confirming automated case logs required an average of 68.4 ± 75.1 seconds per case. Per ACGME case minimums, automated logging reduced time by 66%, saving a neurosurgical resident 58 hours over the course of 5 operative, clinical years. CONCLUSION: Automated case logs provide an accurate, time-effective tool that can reduce administrative burden. Future studies should evaluate how to further improve and broaden the application of automated case logs to other specialties.

Neurosurgery
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), Harvard University (US), Brown University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.