Digital remains, post-mortem privacy, and the commercial exploitation of a deceased person's likeness

Rapid advancements in generative AI enable the precise recreation of deceased individuals' digital identities, raising critical concerns about post-mortem privacy and commercial exploitation. While technology now generates hyper-realistic avatars and voice clones, Indian jurisprudence remains constrained by the “actio personalis moritur cum persona” maxim, which extinguishes privacy and personality rights upon death. Consequently, domestic laws such as the Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023 fail to address the weaponisation of digital remains or to provide remedies against unauthorised AI replicas. Through a comparative analysis of US and EU frameworks, this paper examines India’s regulatory void and the resulting vulnerability of deceased personas to corporate exploitation. To resolve this, the study proposes the Unified Digital Afterlife Framework: a sui generis model that formally recognizes transmissible post-mortem personality rights, mandates strict AI developer consent obligations, and establishes a centralized licensing registry. Ultimately, protecting post-mortem digital identity is a necessary legal evolution to preserve human dignity and autonomy in an increasingly synthetic media landscape.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22713333
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital remains, post-mortem privacy, and the commercial exploitation of a deceased person's likeness

Tripti Sharma, Navneet Kaur, Apneet Kaur Gulati, Dimpy Tibrewal et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Digital remains, post-mortem privacy, and the commercial exploitation of a deceased person's likeness

Tripti Sharma, Navneet Kaur, Apneet Kaur Gulati, Dimpy Tibrewal, Nandini, Subhash Gill
article en

Abstract

Rapid advancements in generative AI enable the precise recreation of deceased individuals' digital identities, raising critical concerns about post-mortem privacy and commercial exploitation. While technology now generates hyper-realistic avatars and voice clones, Indian jurisprudence remains constrained by the “actio personalis moritur cum persona” maxim, which extinguishes privacy and personality rights upon death. Consequently, domestic laws such as the Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023 fail to address the weaponisation of digital remains or to provide remedies against unauthorised AI replicas. Through a comparative analysis of US and EU frameworks, this paper examines India’s regulatory void and the resulting vulnerability of deceased personas to corporate exploitation. To resolve this, the study proposes the Unified Digital Afterlife Framework: a sui generis model that formally recognizes transmissible post-mortem personality rights, mandates strict AI developer consent obligations, and establishes a centralized licensing registry. Ultimately, protecting post-mortem digital identity is a necessary legal evolution to preserve human dignity and autonomy in an increasingly synthetic media landscape.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.