Incremental Value of PI-RADS v2.1 for Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective 1.5-T MRI Cohort

The incremental value of PI-RADS for predicting adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed through systematic biopsy remains uncertain. We assessed whether PI-RADS improves discrimination beyond age, MRI-derived prostate-specificantigen density (PSAD), biopsy Grade Group, and quantitative biopsy tumour burden. This retrospective study included 284 men undergoing 1.5-T mpMRI, systematic biopsy, and radical prostatectomy between January 2020 and January 2026. Adverse pathology comprised prostatectomy Grade Group ≥ 3 and/or stage ≥ pT3a. Three logistic models were compared: age/PSAD/biopsy grade/tumour burden; age/PSAD/PI-RADS; and their combination. Internal validation used 2000 bootstrap samples. Adverse pathology occurred in 143 patients (50.4%). Apparent AUCs were 0.790 (95% CI 0.737–0.843), 0.713 (0.653–0.773), and 0.799 (0.747–0.851); optimism-corrected AUCs were 0.781, 0.703, and 0.787. Adding PI-RADS ≥ 4 yielded an adjusted OR of 1.996 (95% CI 1.150–3.465) and an apparent AUC difference of 0.009 (95% CI −0.015 to 0.033; descriptive DeLong p = 0.469). The combined model had a corrected calibration slope of 0.915 and Brier score of 0.187. PI-RADS from routine 1.5-T mpMRI was independently associated with adverse pathology, but its incremental discrimination beyond clinical and systematicbiopsy variables was small and uncertain. These findings concern a surgery-selected systematicbiopsy pathway, do not estimate the overall value of MRI, and require external validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33090554
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incremental Value of PI-RADS v2.1 for Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective 1.5-T MRI Cohort

Yunus Kayalı, Onur Erdemoğlu, Bilal Eryıldırım, Fatih Bıçaklıoğlu et al.
Current Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Incremental Value of PI-RADS v2.1 for Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective 1.5-T MRI Cohort

Yunus Kayalı, Onur Erdemoğlu, Bilal Eryıldırım, Fatih Bıçaklıoğlu, Yiğit Kudret Akyol, Melih Colak, Alpcan Torun
article en

Abstract

The incremental value of PI-RADS for predicting adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed through systematic biopsy remains uncertain. We assessed whether PI-RADS improves discrimination beyond age, MRI-derived prostate-specificantigen density (PSAD), biopsy Grade Group, and quantitative biopsy tumour burden. This retrospective study included 284 men undergoing 1.5-T mpMRI, systematic biopsy, and radical prostatectomy between January 2020 and January 2026. Adverse pathology comprised prostatectomy Grade Group ≥ 3 and/or stage ≥ pT3a. Three logistic models were compared: age/PSAD/biopsy grade/tumour burden; age/PSAD/PI-RADS; and their combination. Internal validation used 2000 bootstrap samples. Adverse pathology occurred in 143 patients (50.4%). Apparent AUCs were 0.790 (95% CI 0.737–0.843), 0.713 (0.653–0.773), and 0.799 (0.747–0.851); optimism-corrected AUCs were 0.781, 0.703, and 0.787. Adding PI-RADS ≥ 4 yielded an adjusted OR of 1.996 (95% CI 1.150–3.465) and an apparent AUC difference of 0.009 (95% CI −0.015 to 0.033; descriptive DeLong p = 0.469). The combined model had a corrected calibration slope of 0.915 and Brier score of 0.187. PI-RADS from routine 1.5-T mpMRI was independently associated with adverse pathology, but its incremental discrimination beyond clinical and systematicbiopsy variables was small and uncertain. These findings concern a surgery-selected systematicbiopsy pathway, do not estimate the overall value of MRI, and require external validation.

Current OncologyVol. 33(9)
Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.