Clinical Impact of Adherence to Fractional Flow Reserve Guidance in Acute Coronary Syndrome
BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is established to guide revascularization in stable coronary disease and non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, real-world adherence to FFR guidance across the spectrum of ACS presentations, including ambiguous culprit scenarios, remains incompletely characterized. AIMS: To evaluate the clinical impact of adherence to FFR guidance in ACS. METHODS: From a multicenter prospective FFR registry, we analyzed 501 ACS patients who underwent FFR measurement: 222 with clear culprit lesions and 279 with ambiguous culprit lesions. Patients were classified as FFR-concordant (all FFR ≤ 0.80 treated; all FFR > 0.80 deferred) or FFR-discordant (≥ 1 FFR-hemodynamic mismatch). The patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) comprised all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or any revascularization; the patient-oriented FFR-related composite endpoint (POFRC) comprised cardiac death or myocardial infarction or revascularization involving an FFR-assessed vessel at 2 years. RESULTS: Among 501 patients, 431 (86%) received FFR-concordant management and 70 (14%) FFR-discordant management. FFR discordance clustered in the gray zone (0.75-0.85), with 3.5-fold higher prevalence compared with other FFR ranges. Over 2 years, FFR-discordant management was associated with significantly higher POCE (Kaplan-Meier incidence 20.0% vs. 10.4%; propensity-weighted hazard ratio [HR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-4.29, p = 0.009). The POFRC confirmed and strengthened this association (19.0% vs. 8.8%; propensity-weighted HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.37-4.91, p = 0.004). The adverse impact of FFR discordance was consistent across clear culprit and ambiguous culprit subgroups (p for interaction = 0.52) and across types of ACS (p for interaction = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world ACS management, adherence to FFR guidance is associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with FFR-discordant decision-making.
Authors
- Sungmin Lim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-4440)
- Eun Ho Choo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3166-3176)
- Donggyu Moon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4927-3248)
- Ik Jun Choi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-2346)
- Dae‐Won Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2219-1835)
- Kiyuk Chang
Institutions
- St. Mary's Hospital (US)
- The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR)
- The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
- The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
- The Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
- St. Mary's Hospital (US)
- The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2026-09-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70853
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Abbott Vascular