Clinical Impact of Adherence to Fractional Flow Reserve Guidance in Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is established to guide revascularization in stable coronary disease and non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, real-world adherence to FFR guidance across the spectrum of ACS presentations, including ambiguous culprit scenarios, remains incompletely characterized. AIMS: To evaluate the clinical impact of adherence to FFR guidance in ACS. METHODS: From a multicenter prospective FFR registry, we analyzed 501 ACS patients who underwent FFR measurement: 222 with clear culprit lesions and 279 with ambiguous culprit lesions. Patients were classified as FFR-concordant (all FFR ≤ 0.80 treated; all FFR > 0.80 deferred) or FFR-discordant (≥ 1 FFR-hemodynamic mismatch). The patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) comprised all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or any revascularization; the patient-oriented FFR-related composite endpoint (POFRC) comprised cardiac death or myocardial infarction or revascularization involving an FFR-assessed vessel at 2 years. RESULTS: Among 501 patients, 431 (86%) received FFR-concordant management and 70 (14%) FFR-discordant management. FFR discordance clustered in the gray zone (0.75-0.85), with 3.5-fold higher prevalence compared with other FFR ranges. Over 2 years, FFR-discordant management was associated with significantly higher POCE (Kaplan-Meier incidence 20.0% vs. 10.4%; propensity-weighted hazard ratio [HR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-4.29, p = 0.009). The POFRC confirmed and strengthened this association (19.0% vs. 8.8%; propensity-weighted HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.37-4.91, p = 0.004). The adverse impact of FFR discordance was consistent across clear culprit and ambiguous culprit subgroups (p for interaction = 0.52) and across types of ACS (p for interaction = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world ACS management, adherence to FFR guidance is associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with FFR-discordant decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70853
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Clinical Impact of Adherence to Fractional Flow Reserve Guidance in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Sungmin Lim, Eun Ho Choo, Donggyu Moon, Ik Jun Choi et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Clinical Impact of Adherence to Fractional Flow Reserve Guidance in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Sungmin Lim, Eun Ho Choo, Donggyu Moon, Ik Jun Choi, Dae‐Won Kim, Kiyuk Chang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is established to guide revascularization in stable coronary disease and non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, real-world adherence to FFR guidance across the spectrum of ACS presentations, including ambiguous culprit scenarios, remains incompletely characterized. AIMS: To evaluate the clinical impact of adherence to FFR guidance in ACS. METHODS: From a multicenter prospective FFR registry, we analyzed 501 ACS patients who underwent FFR measurement: 222 with clear culprit lesions and 279 with ambiguous culprit lesions. Patients were classified as FFR-concordant (all FFR ≤ 0.80 treated; all FFR > 0.80 deferred) or FFR-discordant (≥ 1 FFR-hemodynamic mismatch). The patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) comprised all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or any revascularization; the patient-oriented FFR-related composite endpoint (POFRC) comprised cardiac death or myocardial infarction or revascularization involving an FFR-assessed vessel at 2 years. RESULTS: Among 501 patients, 431 (86%) received FFR-concordant management and 70 (14%) FFR-discordant management. FFR discordance clustered in the gray zone (0.75-0.85), with 3.5-fold higher prevalence compared with other FFR ranges. Over 2 years, FFR-discordant management was associated with significantly higher POCE (Kaplan-Meier incidence 20.0% vs. 10.4%; propensity-weighted hazard ratio [HR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-4.29, p = 0.009). The POFRC confirmed and strengthened this association (19.0% vs. 8.8%; propensity-weighted HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.37-4.91, p = 0.004). The adverse impact of FFR discordance was consistent across clear culprit and ambiguous culprit subgroups (p for interaction = 0.52) and across types of ACS (p for interaction = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world ACS management, adherence to FFR guidance is associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with FFR-discordant decision-making.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
St. Mary's Hospital (US), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), St. Mary's Hospital (US), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
Abbott Vascular
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.