Comparative Analysis of Preadmission Testing Center and Primary Care Physician Clearance Before Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background Effective preoperative evaluation is crucial for mitigating complications and cancellations in total joint arthroplasty. Limited access to a primary care physician (PCP) and fragmented coordination can delay clearance and increase perioperative risk. To address these challenges, preadmission testing centers (PATCs) have been implemented to streamline workflows. This study compares outcomes and cancellation rates between PATC and PCP-led pathways. Methods Retrospective study of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty between June 2022 and November 2024 at 2 community hospitals comparing demographics, outcomes, and cancellation rates between PATC vs PCP. Statistical analyses included sample t -tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. Clinical outcomes including length of stay, discharge disposition, complications, and cancellations were adjusted for age, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results Among 8784 patients, 5641 (64.2%) were evaluated at PATC and 3143 (35.8%) by PCP. Patients evaluated at PATC were younger (68.98 ± 9.35 vs 70.38 ± 9.01 years, P < .001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (median 1.0 [2.0] vs 1.0 [1.0], P < .001). Overall cancellation rates ( P = .637) and 90-day postoperative complications ( P = .212) were similar between groups. However, the PATC group demonstrated a slightly longer length of stay (median 27.9 [5.3] vs 27.5 [5.0] hours, P = .001), higher discharge to skilled nursing facilities (4.0% vs 2.3%, P < .05 after Bonferroni adjustment), and greater postoperative emergency department utilization (6.6% vs 4.0%, P < .001). Conclusions Despite managing a higher-risk population, PATC evaluation demonstrated comparable cancellation and complication rates to PCP clearance, supporting centralized, protocol-driven preoperative evaluation as a viable alternative in real-world settings where access to primary care may be limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroplasty Today
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2026.102145
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Preadmission Testing Center and Primary Care Physician Clearance Before Total Joint Arthroplasty

Swaroopa Vaidya, Jake Laverdiere, Jenna Bernstein, Thomas Giannasca et al.
Arthroplasty Today
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Comparative Analysis of Preadmission Testing Center and Primary Care Physician Clearance Before Total Joint Arthroplasty

Swaroopa Vaidya, Jake Laverdiere, Jenna Bernstein, Thomas Giannasca, Gregory Panza
article en

Abstract

Background Effective preoperative evaluation is crucial for mitigating complications and cancellations in total joint arthroplasty. Limited access to a primary care physician (PCP) and fragmented coordination can delay clearance and increase perioperative risk. To address these challenges, preadmission testing centers (PATCs) have been implemented to streamline workflows. This study compares outcomes and cancellation rates between PATC and PCP-led pathways. Methods Retrospective study of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty between June 2022 and November 2024 at 2 community hospitals comparing demographics, outcomes, and cancellation rates between PATC vs PCP. Statistical analyses included sample t -tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. Clinical outcomes including length of stay, discharge disposition, complications, and cancellations were adjusted for age, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results Among 8784 patients, 5641 (64.2%) were evaluated at PATC and 3143 (35.8%) by PCP. Patients evaluated at PATC were younger (68.98 ± 9.35 vs 70.38 ± 9.01 years, P < .001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (median 1.0 [2.0] vs 1.0 [1.0], P < .001). Overall cancellation rates ( P = .637) and 90-day postoperative complications ( P = .212) were similar between groups. However, the PATC group demonstrated a slightly longer length of stay (median 27.9 [5.3] vs 27.5 [5.0] hours, P = .001), higher discharge to skilled nursing facilities (4.0% vs 2.3%, P < .05 after Bonferroni adjustment), and greater postoperative emergency department utilization (6.6% vs 4.0%, P < .001). Conclusions Despite managing a higher-risk population, PATC evaluation demonstrated comparable cancellation and complication rates to PCP clearance, supporting centralized, protocol-driven preoperative evaluation as a viable alternative in real-world settings where access to primary care may be limited.

Arthroplasty TodayVol. 41
Hartford Hospital (US), St. Vincent's Medical Center (US), Quinnipiac University (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.