Evaluating an AI-enhanced power wheelchair obstacle alert system: Effects of multimodal warning design on warning-response behavior

Accessible and inclusive transport requires mobility technologies that support safe, efficient, and understandable interaction for users with diverse sensory, cognitive, and physical needs. Power wheelchairs are a critical form of personal mobility, yet collisions with obstacles remain a common safety concern. Although intelligent wheelchair systems can detect hazards, evidence on effective warning communication remains limited in time-critical navigation scenarios. This study evaluated an AI-enhanced power wheelchair obstacle alert system in which a You Only Look Once (YOLO)-based pedestrian detection pipeline and depth-based trigger logic were used to activate multimodal warnings through auditory and vibrotactile cues. Twenty-four able-bodied university participants completed wheelchair navigation trials in which warning design varied by vibration configuration, auditory signal type, and information type. Vibration configuration included no vibration, seatback vibration, and wrist vibration; auditory signal type included non-speech and speech cues; and information type included instructional warnings that indicated the required avoidance action and informative warnings that indicated the obstacle location. Results showed that instructional warnings produced shorter reaction times and were rated as more useful and satisfying than informative warnings. Seatback vibrations were associated with shorter reaction times and higher usefulness ratings than audio-only warnings. Non-speech auditory cues produced shorter reaction times than speech cues, but this effect was significant only when no tactile cue was provided. Decision-making accuracy did not differ significantly across warning conditions. These findings suggest that direct action-oriented warnings, especially when paired with seatback vibrotactile feedback, may support faster responses to power wheelchair obstacle warnings. The study contributes to accessible transport design by identifying multimodal interface strategies that may improve human-machine communication in intelligent mobility devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2026.103801
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluating an AI-enhanced power wheelchair obstacle alert system: Effects of multimodal warning design on warning-response behavior

Gaojian Huang, Jingyi Xie, Shirley Tang, Shao-Yu Huang et al.
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Evaluating an AI-enhanced power wheelchair obstacle alert system: Effects of multimodal warning design on warning-response behavior

Gaojian Huang, Jingyi Xie, Shirley Tang, Shao-Yu Huang, Ayush Sunil Gawai, Guannan Liu, Aditya Shah
article en

Abstract

Accessible and inclusive transport requires mobility technologies that support safe, efficient, and understandable interaction for users with diverse sensory, cognitive, and physical needs. Power wheelchairs are a critical form of personal mobility, yet collisions with obstacles remain a common safety concern. Although intelligent wheelchair systems can detect hazards, evidence on effective warning communication remains limited in time-critical navigation scenarios. This study evaluated an AI-enhanced power wheelchair obstacle alert system in which a You Only Look Once (YOLO)-based pedestrian detection pipeline and depth-based trigger logic were used to activate multimodal warnings through auditory and vibrotactile cues. Twenty-four able-bodied university participants completed wheelchair navigation trials in which warning design varied by vibration configuration, auditory signal type, and information type. Vibration configuration included no vibration, seatback vibration, and wrist vibration; auditory signal type included non-speech and speech cues; and information type included instructional warnings that indicated the required avoidance action and informative warnings that indicated the obstacle location. Results showed that instructional warnings produced shorter reaction times and were rated as more useful and satisfying than informative warnings. Seatback vibrations were associated with shorter reaction times and higher usefulness ratings than audio-only warnings. Non-speech auditory cues produced shorter reaction times than speech cues, but this effect was significant only when no tactile cue was provided. Decision-making accuracy did not differ significantly across warning conditions. These findings suggest that direct action-oriented warnings, especially when paired with seatback vibrotactile feedback, may support faster responses to power wheelchair obstacle warnings. The study contributes to accessible transport design by identifying multimodal interface strategies that may improve human-machine communication in intelligent mobility devices.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 123
San Jose State University (US)
American Honda Motor
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.