Evaluating AI Job Replacement Concern in an Open Cross-Industry Dataset: Provenance, Measurement, and Relational Validity

Open workforce datasets can help to extend research on artificial intelligence (AI) only if they are sufficiently provenance-traceable, have good measurement quality, and have a relational structure suitable for behavioral inference. This study examines a benchmark dataset comprising 12,000 linked records across 15 industry categories and 47,206 AI tool-use records. Sampling, recruitment, questionnaire wording, respondent authentication, ethics procedures, and whether the records are real or synthetic are not documented, so the dataset is treated as a tabular source rather than verified workforce evidence. Analyses are limited to indicators that have been observed directly, including job satisfaction, work–life balance, career outlook, trust in AI, weekly learning hours, AI-use intensity, and employer-provided AI training. Assessment of behavioral interpretation of the data was conducted using Spearman correlations, HC3-robust regressions, false discovery rate adjustment, secondary industry interaction checks, and a relational-realism diagnostic. Concerns about AI replacing jobs were negligible and non-significant on a five-point scale, with an average of 2.745. Training also showed no robust association when evaluated against outcomes that did not contain training. The median absolute Spearman correlation across conceptually related observed variables was 0.0064, with the 95th percentile at 0.0180, which is very low. These estimates reflect the characteristics of the supplied documents rather than employee actions, and do not assess conservation of resources processes or tourism worker outcomes. Results from the analysis demonstrate the importance of checking open workforce data for construct validity, relational validity, sector fit and provenance before testing behavioral theories. Research for regenerative tourism requires reliable sector-specific samples, reliable multi-item measures, longitudinal design, and direct measures of social and destination outcomes.