US jail and prison institutional research policies: a lever in access to research for incarcerated people

Incarcerated people are often excluded from health research, limiting the evidence available to address the specific needs of this population. US federal regulations provide a foundation for research involving incarcerated people, but many prison and jail systems have developed institution-specific policies that further govern research. Carceral research policies may represent an underexamined mechanism for regulating research access in prisons and jails. We analyzed US carceral research policies and found substantial variation across systems, including approaches to ethical oversight and institutional discretion over research activities and dissemination of research findings. The wide variation in policies, power facilities have over research access, and potential censoring of findings highlights the need for more standardized practices. We propose policy changes that would better align carceral research policies with best practices in research governance, facilitating ethical research access and strengthening the evidence needed to address the health needs of this marginalized population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2026.101631
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

US jail and prison institutional research policies: a lever in access to research for incarcerated people

Kathryn M. Porter, Devan M. Duenas, Helen E. Jack, Shaheer Arif et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

US jail and prison institutional research policies: a lever in access to research for incarcerated people

Kathryn M. Porter, Devan M. Duenas, Helen E. Jack, Shaheer Arif, Alysse G. Wurcel, Justin Berk, Zoë Senter, Brendan Saloner, Esam Ahsan, Claire Wolfer-Jenkins
article en

Abstract

Incarcerated people are often excluded from health research, limiting the evidence available to address the specific needs of this population. US federal regulations provide a foundation for research involving incarcerated people, but many prison and jail systems have developed institution-specific policies that further govern research. Carceral research policies may represent an underexamined mechanism for regulating research access in prisons and jails. We analyzed US carceral research policies and found substantial variation across systems, including approaches to ethical oversight and institutional discretion over research activities and dissemination of research findings. The wide variation in policies, power facilities have over research access, and potential censoring of findings highlights the need for more standardized practices. We propose policy changes that would better align carceral research policies with best practices in research governance, facilitating ethical research access and strengthening the evidence needed to address the health needs of this marginalized population.

The Lancet Regional Health - AmericasVol. 63
Washington State Department of Health (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Seattle Children's Hospital (US), University of Washington (US), Brown University (US), Rice Research Institute (CN), Alice L. Walton School of Medicine (US), Rhode Island College (US), Rice University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.