The Transformation of Political Regime and Capital Fractions in Turkey: The AKP, TÜSİAD and MÜSİAD (2002–2017)

This study examines the evolving roles of TÜSİAD and MÜSİAD in the process of constructing the new political regime that was institutionalized in Turkey in 2017. Addressing a gap in the literature regarding the position of the capitalist class in regime debates, it argues that the stances of both capital organizations towards the Presidential Government System are neither linear nor homogeneous. In this context, it is contended that TÜSİAD’s and MÜSİAD’s positions vis-à-vis the new political regime have varied over time in line with changes in the AKP government’s capacity to respond to the needs and demands of different fractions of capital. The study further suggests that regime transformation in Turkey cannot be explained solely through the preferences of the ruling political power, but should instead be understood in relation to the struggles among different fractions of capital and broader crisis dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2026.2731325
Primary Topic
Turkey's Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Transformation of Political Regime and Capital Fractions in Turkey: The AKP, TÜSİAD and MÜSİAD (2002–2017)

Hande Beyza DOĞDU, Güven Öztan
Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
Turkey's Politics and Society
article

The Transformation of Political Regime and Capital Fractions in Turkey: The AKP, TÜSİAD and MÜSİAD (2002–2017)

Hande Beyza DOĞDU, Güven Öztan
article en

Abstract

This study examines the evolving roles of TÜSİAD and MÜSİAD in the process of constructing the new political regime that was institutionalized in Turkey in 2017. Addressing a gap in the literature regarding the position of the capitalist class in regime debates, it argues that the stances of both capital organizations towards the Presidential Government System are neither linear nor homogeneous. In this context, it is contended that TÜSİAD’s and MÜSİAD’s positions vis-à-vis the new political regime have varied over time in line with changes in the AKP government’s capacity to respond to the needs and demands of different fractions of capital. The study further suggests that regime transformation in Turkey cannot be explained solely through the preferences of the ruling political power, but should instead be understood in relation to the struggles among different fractions of capital and broader crisis dynamics.

Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Turkey's Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.