From legacy finite element modeling to explainable simulation: Technical requirements for XAI in computational mechanics

Abstract This paper establishes technical requirements for explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in computational mechanics, with an emphasis on controlling both the model-form and discretization errors in finite element analysis. We argue that explanation accuracy and the identification of knowledge limits—central requirements of XAI—can be satisfied only when these error sources are systematically estimated and controlled. A model-centric framework is developed in which hierarchical discretization and model hierarchies enable traceability of modeling assumptions and quantitative assessment of their impact on quantities of interest. The approach is illustrated through numerical studies of the stability and post-buckling behavior of spherical and hemispherical shells. The results indicate that achieving XAI in engineering requires a transition from legacy element-centric implementations to formulations grounded in the science of finite element analysis, with important implications for software architecture and simulation workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Mechanics
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-026-02845-z
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From legacy finite element modeling to explainable simulation: Technical requirements for XAI in computational mechanics

Barna Szabo
Computational Mechanics
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

From legacy finite element modeling to explainable simulation: Technical requirements for XAI in computational mechanics

Barna Szabo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper establishes technical requirements for explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in computational mechanics, with an emphasis on controlling both the model-form and discretization errors in finite element analysis. We argue that explanation accuracy and the identification of knowledge limits—central requirements of XAI—can be satisfied only when these error sources are systematically estimated and controlled. A model-centric framework is developed in which hierarchical discretization and model hierarchies enable traceability of modeling assumptions and quantitative assessment of their impact on quantities of interest. The approach is illustrated through numerical studies of the stability and post-buckling behavior of spherical and hemispherical shells. The results indicate that achieving XAI in engineering requires a transition from legacy element-centric implementations to formulations grounded in the science of finite element analysis, with important implications for software architecture and simulation workflows.

Computational Mechanics
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From legacy finite element modeling to explainable simulation: Technical requirements for XAI in computational mechanics — Barna Szabo · Computational Mechanics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS