Experiment-Anchored Probabilistic Seismic Demand Modelling and Fragility Analysis of a Non-Ductile RC Frame

This study develops a probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM) to establish the relationship between intensity measures (IMs) and engineering demand parameters (EDPs) for assessing the seismic vulnerability and risk of non-ductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings. A three-dimensional finite element model was initially constructed and calibrated against experimental test results to ensure reliability. A comprehensive cloud analysis was then carried out using near-fault pulse-like (NF-FD), near-fault non-pulse-like (NF-NFD), and far-fault (FF) ground motion sets. In the first stage, thirty-one widely adopted IMs were systematically categorized into earthquake-based, event-based, and structure-based groups. Regression analyses were subsequently performed for five representative EDPs to quantify the predictive capacity of IMs in capturing structural response demands. The efficiency, correlation, practicality, proficiency, and sufficiency of all IMs were rigorously examined to identify the most appropriate parameter. The results indicated that the structure-based IM, Sa(T 1 ), consistently outperformed other measures and was recognized as the optimum IM across all three ground motion sets. Among earthquake-based IMs, the Acceleration Spectrum Intensity (ASI) proved optimum for both NF-FD and NF-NFD records, while the Velocity Spectrum Intensity (VSI) was identified as the most appropriate for FF records. Fragility functions were subsequently developed for the optimum and other selected IMs across the considered EDPs. Using fragility relationships, Expected Loss Ratio (ELR) values were computed and validated against shake table experiments subjected to FF records. A strong and statistically significant correlation was observed between the analytically derived ELR estimates and experimental results. The findings of this study provide critical insights into the seismic performance assessment of non-ductile RC frame structures, contributing to a more robust understanding of their vulnerability under diverse ground motion scenarios. The proposed framework also offers a valuable reference for future research efforts and the development of effective seismic risk mitigation strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793431126500260
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiment-Anchored Probabilistic Seismic Demand Modelling and Fragility Analysis of a Non-Ductile RC Frame

Ali Yeşilyurt, Resat Oyguc, Ferit Cakir
Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Experiment-Anchored Probabilistic Seismic Demand Modelling and Fragility Analysis of a Non-Ductile RC Frame

Ali Yeşilyurt, Resat Oyguc, Ferit Cakir
article en

Abstract

This study develops a probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM) to establish the relationship between intensity measures (IMs) and engineering demand parameters (EDPs) for assessing the seismic vulnerability and risk of non-ductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings. A three-dimensional finite element model was initially constructed and calibrated against experimental test results to ensure reliability. A comprehensive cloud analysis was then carried out using near-fault pulse-like (NF-FD), near-fault non-pulse-like (NF-NFD), and far-fault (FF) ground motion sets. In the first stage, thirty-one widely adopted IMs were systematically categorized into earthquake-based, event-based, and structure-based groups. Regression analyses were subsequently performed for five representative EDPs to quantify the predictive capacity of IMs in capturing structural response demands. The efficiency, correlation, practicality, proficiency, and sufficiency of all IMs were rigorously examined to identify the most appropriate parameter. The results indicated that the structure-based IM, Sa(T 1 ), consistently outperformed other measures and was recognized as the optimum IM across all three ground motion sets. Among earthquake-based IMs, the Acceleration Spectrum Intensity (ASI) proved optimum for both NF-FD and NF-NFD records, while the Velocity Spectrum Intensity (VSI) was identified as the most appropriate for FF records. Fragility functions were subsequently developed for the optimum and other selected IMs across the considered EDPs. Using fragility relationships, Expected Loss Ratio (ELR) values were computed and validated against shake table experiments subjected to FF records. A strong and statistically significant correlation was observed between the analytically derived ELR estimates and experimental results. The findings of this study provide critical insights into the seismic performance assessment of non-ductile RC frame structures, contributing to a more robust understanding of their vulnerability under diverse ground motion scenarios. The proposed framework also offers a valuable reference for future research efforts and the development of effective seismic risk mitigation strategies.

Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.