Interracial Publics

This article examines the formation of “interracial publics” in postapartheid South Africa, showing how race, intimacy, and belonging are negotiated through mediated encounters. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, interviews, and media analysis, it traces how relationships between people historically classified as “white” and “nonwhite” become publicly visible and collectively interpreted across print, broadcast, and digital platforms. These publics are ambivalent and contested: they can normalize formerly forbidden intimacies and foster cross-racial connection, yet they also reinscribe racialized hierarchies through gendered and sexualized discourse. Situating these dynamics within South Africa’s longer histories of settler colonialism and apartheid, the article argues that the regulation of intimacy has been central to projects of racial governance and white supremacy and continues to animate their afterlives in contemporary struggles over visibility, belonging, and desire. Interracial intimacy functions as both a measure and a mediator of contemporary racial formations, contributing to comparative anthropological debates on race, media, affect, and the public sphere in postcolonial societies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Anthropology
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/742629
Primary Topic
Asian American and Pacific Histories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Interracial Publics

Sebastian Jackson
Current Anthropology
Asian American and Pacific Histories
article

Interracial Publics

Sebastian Jackson
article en

Abstract

This article examines the formation of “interracial publics” in postapartheid South Africa, showing how race, intimacy, and belonging are negotiated through mediated encounters. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, interviews, and media analysis, it traces how relationships between people historically classified as “white” and “nonwhite” become publicly visible and collectively interpreted across print, broadcast, and digital platforms. These publics are ambivalent and contested: they can normalize formerly forbidden intimacies and foster cross-racial connection, yet they also reinscribe racialized hierarchies through gendered and sexualized discourse. Situating these dynamics within South Africa’s longer histories of settler colonialism and apartheid, the article argues that the regulation of intimacy has been central to projects of racial governance and white supremacy and continues to animate their afterlives in contemporary struggles over visibility, belonging, and desire. Interracial intimacy functions as both a measure and a mediator of contemporary racial formations, contributing to comparative anthropological debates on race, media, affect, and the public sphere in postcolonial societies.

Current Anthropology
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Asian American and Pacific Histories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interracial Publics — Sebastian Jackson · Current Anthropology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS