Association of the metabolic score for visceral fat (METS‑VF) with incident subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in Chinese health‑screening participants: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Visceral adiposity contributes to metabolic dysfunction and atherogenesis; however, whether integrated indices of visceral fat-related metabolic burden are independently associated with incident preclinical vascular disease remains unclear. This study analyzed a large Chinese health-screening cohort to determine the relationship between metabolic score for visceral fat (METS‑VF) and incident subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (SCCA). Methods A total of 4,109 participants without baseline SCCA who underwent carotid ultrasonography at a tertiary health management center in 2022 were included. Follow-up was measured from the date of baseline ultrasonography to the onset of SCCA or the last available health check-up. METS‑VF was calculated using a validated algorithm and analyzed both as a continuous variable and by quartiles. Missing covariates were handled using multiple imputation. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to assess time-to-event associations, restricted cubic splines were used to examine dose–response relationships, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to corroborate the findings. Results Participants were followed for a median of 35 months (IQR: 24–37 months; total: 9,315 person-years), during which 890 incident SCCA cases were identified (cumulative incidence: 21.7%). In multivariable models controlling for covariates, every single‑unit increment in METS‑VF corresponded to a 30% greater hazard for SCCA (HR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.15–1.48; P < 0.001). Relative to the lowest quartile (Q1), participants in Q3 had an adjusted HR of 1.42 (95% CI 1.13–1.79; P = 0.003), and those in Q4 had an adjusted HR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.15–1.86; P = 0.002); the trend across quartiles was significant ( P = 0.002). Restricted cubic spline modeling demonstrated a significant linear association (overall P = 0.001; P for non-linearity = 0.998). These associations remained robust across predefined subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Among Chinese health‑screening participants, higher METS-VF was associated with an increased risk of incident SCCA after multivariable adjustment. As a simple and cost-effective integrative marker, METS‑VF may deserve further evaluation as a risk stratification tool. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2600119965; Registered on March 6, 2026, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=302327 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-05169-z
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of the metabolic score for visceral fat (METS‑VF) with incident subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in Chinese health‑screening participants: a retrospective cohort study

Qixiang Lei, Ke Ming, Yu Lu, Maoli Guo et al.
European journal of medical research
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Association of the metabolic score for visceral fat (METS‑VF) with incident subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in Chinese health‑screening participants: a retrospective cohort study

Qixiang Lei, Ke Ming, Yu Lu, Maoli Guo, You You, Qian Zha, Zhaoqin Dong
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Visceral adiposity contributes to metabolic dysfunction and atherogenesis; however, whether integrated indices of visceral fat-related metabolic burden are independently associated with incident preclinical vascular disease remains unclear. This study analyzed a large Chinese health-screening cohort to determine the relationship between metabolic score for visceral fat (METS‑VF) and incident subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (SCCA). Methods A total of 4,109 participants without baseline SCCA who underwent carotid ultrasonography at a tertiary health management center in 2022 were included. Follow-up was measured from the date of baseline ultrasonography to the onset of SCCA or the last available health check-up. METS‑VF was calculated using a validated algorithm and analyzed both as a continuous variable and by quartiles. Missing covariates were handled using multiple imputation. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to assess time-to-event associations, restricted cubic splines were used to examine dose–response relationships, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to corroborate the findings. Results Participants were followed for a median of 35 months (IQR: 24–37 months; total: 9,315 person-years), during which 890 incident SCCA cases were identified (cumulative incidence: 21.7%). In multivariable models controlling for covariates, every single‑unit increment in METS‑VF corresponded to a 30% greater hazard for SCCA (HR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.15–1.48; P < 0.001). Relative to the lowest quartile (Q1), participants in Q3 had an adjusted HR of 1.42 (95% CI 1.13–1.79; P = 0.003), and those in Q4 had an adjusted HR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.15–1.86; P = 0.002); the trend across quartiles was significant ( P = 0.002). Restricted cubic spline modeling demonstrated a significant linear association (overall P = 0.001; P for non-linearity = 0.998). These associations remained robust across predefined subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Among Chinese health‑screening participants, higher METS-VF was associated with an increased risk of incident SCCA after multivariable adjustment. As a simple and cost-effective integrative marker, METS‑VF may deserve further evaluation as a risk stratification tool. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2600119965; Registered on March 6, 2026, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=302327 .

European journal of medical research
Zigong First People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.